住宅小区的WBS与独栋住宅的WBS有何不同？

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The question asks about how the WBS (Work Breakdown Structure) for a residential community differs from that of a detached single-family home. 
Since the answer options are not provided, I will outline the key distinctions conceptually and then relate them to the single given answer choice.
First, for a residential community, the project typically encompasses more than just a single dwelling. It usually includes multiple housing units and shared facilities, so the WBS must cover both individual unit work (for each dwelling) and collective infrastructure and amenities that are shared among residents. This means the WBS would have hierarchies that represent the parts of the project that are common to all units (e.g., roads, power and water distribution networks, common social or recreational facilities, landscaping, drainage, and amenities) in addition to the work tied to each separate unit.
Second, in contrast, a detached single-family home project typically focuses on a single principal dwelling. The WBS is centered on the components of that one house and its immediate site improvements, with less emphasis on shared systems or multi-unit coordination. The scope is narrower, and the line items for common infrastructure or multi-unit coordination are either minimal or absent.
Now, evaluating the provided answer choice: '它将包括共享基础设施和多个单元范围。' which translates to 'It will include shared infrastructure and multiple unit scope.' This aligns with the typical distinction for a residential community WBS, because such a project must account for both shared infrastructure and the work related to multiple housing units. It highlights the broader, multi-unit scope that is not present in a single-family house WBS.
If there were alternative options, we would weigh them against these points: whether they limit the scope to only internal unit work, ignore shared systems, or treat the project as a single unit, which would be inaccurate for a multi-unit community project. Remember that the essence of a community’s WBS is to model both the per-unit work and the shared, cross-unit infrastructure and facilities, whereas a single-family WBS would largely be confined to the unit and its site.
In summary, the core difference is the breadth of scope: community-level WBS includes shared infrastructure and multiple units, while single-family WBS focuses on a single dwelling with limited emphasis on shared systems.

2258-1_20CM3034001 工作分解结构

住宅小区的WBS与独栋住宅的WBS有何不同？

查看解析

登录即可查看完整答案

类似问题

按CSI部门组织的WBS是以下分组方式的一个例子：

在创建基础工程工作分解结构 (WBS) 时，哪些内容会显示在较低级别的细节中？

在创建基础工程工作分解结构 (WBS) 时，哪些内容会显示在较低级别的细节中？

按CSI部门组织的WBS是以下分组方式的一个例子：

单户住宅的WBS可能包含以下哪些要素？

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

Economic stress and unpredictable times have resulted in a booming industry for self-help products

People born without creativity never can develop it

更多留学生实用工具

考试浏览器助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单