题目
多项选择题
Is this a real article (written by a journalist to a newspaper) or fake (written by a computer or a troll factory)? Also indicate the veracity of the information by choosing false, partly true or true.Wind energy bird mortality secrets September 17, 2019 – Jim Wiegand When the wind energy industry was in its infancy, I was fresh out of college and studying raptors—eagles, hawks and falcons—near Altamont, California. I didn’t think much about the wind turbines, aside from thinking they were an eyesore. That changed when the data began to emerge about how wind turbines annually kill millions of birds and thousands of raptors—the birds I have spent my life trying to save. Every time I see a wind turbine now, it reminds me that this industry is an affront to nearly everything I stand for. Since 1995 many thousands of eagles have been collected from wind farm freezers by U.S. Fish and Wildlife and then shipped off to Denver’s eagle repository. My estimate is that over 30,000 eagle carcasses have been picked up from wind farms since 1995. Across the world dozens of endangered species are being pushed to extinction from wind turbines. The policy that has helped advance the industry is called the federal Production Tax Credit, and it has poured billions of taxpayer dollars to fuel the rapid building of wind turbines across the country. It’s time to end the PTC. The PTC is set to expire at the end of this year. But wind energy proponents, ignoring the effects of wind turbines on birds, are already pushing Congress to renew this subsidy. Taxpayer advocates have the right to be upset about this. But what concerns me most is that the extension of the PTC will continue to fuel the deaths of millions of birds while pretending to help save the planet.
查看解析
标准答案
Please login to view
思路分析
Context and task: You are asked to decide whether the provided piece is a real article by a journalist or fake (and to indicate veracity as false, partly true, or true). The item is a multiple-answers question with two options: b. Fake and d. Partly true. We will evaluate each option in turn, explaining why it might be considered true or false, and why the other option is not accurate, drawing on typical signs of real journalism vs. fabrication and on the content presented.
Option b: Fake
- What would count as evidence for this being fake? If the piece were computer-generated or produced by a troll factory, we would expect signs such as inconsistent attribution, implausible claims, lack of verifiable context (no date, no known author, no organization), or a style that reads like a generic rant rather than a stated journalistic voice. In the provided text, there is a byline-like fragment (Wind energy bird mortality secrets September 17, 2019 – Jim Wiegand) that resembles a dated article header and a named person, which is mor......Login to view full explanation登录即可查看完整答案
我们收录了全球超50000道考试原题与详细解析,现在登录,立即获得答案。
更多留学生实用工具
希望你的学习变得更简单
加入我们,立即解锁 海量真题 与 独家解析,让复习快人一步!