What is a major "problem" with the Colorado River Compact?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Question restatement: What is a major "problem" with the Colorado River Compact?

Option 1: 'It expired in the year 2000, and there is no clear idea as to how this will affect the economy'. This statement is inaccurate because the Colorado River Compact did not simply expire in 2000; rather, the compact has been the subject of renegotiations and additional agreements, but claiming an outright expiration mischaracterizes the legal status and ongoing governance framework of the river. It also speculates about economic impact without detailing the actual legal timelines or disputes that have occurred since then.

Option 2: 'It unfairly penalizes lower basin states for conserving water'. This option suggests a normative claim about equity and incentives, but the core critique of the compact is not about punishing lower basin states for conservation. In fact, the allocation framework assigns fixed shares that can create tension over usage and return flows, rather than a straightforward penalty for conservation by downstream states. The argument here does not directly address the structural flaw most commonly discussed by hydrologists and policymakers.

Option 3: 'It is based on hydrologic data obtained during a period of anomalously high river flow'. This is a well-known critique: the original allocations were shaped by hydrologic data from a time of unusually high flows, which can lead to overestimation of sustainable long-term yields. When years of abundant flow are followed by drought conditions, the legally binding allocations may be stressed, causing water-shortage problems for downstream users and system-wide renegotiation needs. This critique highlights a fundamental issue with basing policies on non-representative hydrological conditions.

Option 4: 'It sets lower water quality standards for the upper basin states than for the lower basin states'. This statement does not accurately capture the primary "problem" discussed in relation to the compact. The compact focuses on allocation of water quantity among basins and doesn't establish differentiated water quality standards by basin as its central criticism. Water quality concerns are important, but they are not the defining critique of the compact’s design in mainstream discourse.

Summary of the analysis: Option 3 identifies a core, widely discussed flaw—the reliance on a period of anomalously high flows to set long-term allocation, which can misrepresent sustainable supply, especially under drought. The other options either misstate the legal status, misattribute incentives related to conservation to a central problem, or mischaracterize the primary focus of the compact (which is quantity allocations rather than quality standards).

EART-30-01 💡 Week 9 Quiz 3

What is a major "problem" with the Colorado River Compact?

查看解析

登录即可查看完整答案

类似问题

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

Economic stress and unpredictable times have resulted in a booming industry for self-help products

People born without creativity never can develop it

A product has a selling price of $20, a contribution margin ratio of 40% and fixed cost of $120,000. To make a profit of $30,000. The number of units that must be sold is: Type the number without $ and a comma. Eg: 20000

Which of the following statement regarding cost is correct:

Under the assumptions used in cost-volume-profit analysis, as the activity increases:

The CVP and break-even analysis are supported by a range of important assumptions. Which of the following is not an assumption of the CVP:

The break-even point is that at which:

更多留学生实用工具

考试浏览器助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单