For the same type of job, large firms pay more than small firms.

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

This statement concerns the relationship between firm size and pay for the same job type, a topic often discussed in labor economics and human resource management.
Option 1: True. In many labor market studies, larger firms exhibit a wage premium relative to smaller firms for comparable roles. Possible reasons include greater bargaining power, higher productivity or revenue bases, more formalized pay scales, better access to training and career ladders, and stronger ability to finance higher wages. Additionally, larger organizations may face tighter internal equity norms that raise the baseline for compensation to maintain parity across similar positions. These mechanisms collectively can lead to higher pay at large firms for the same job category.
Option 2: False. If one argues against the statement, it would need to point to contexts where small firms pay more, or where the size-related premium disappears. However, such counterexamples are less common in aggregate analyses. Some caveats exist: in certain industries, startup dynamics, geographic differences, or firms with high-skill shortages might temporarily offer higher pay to attract talent, but these instances do not generally overturn the broader pattern observed across multiple sectors. Moreover, local conditions or non-wage benefits could complicate direct comparisons of pay for the same job type, making a precise one-to-one claim overly simplistic in some cases.
Exploring the underlying logic, it helps to distinguish wage levels (base pay) from compensation packages. Large firms may provide higher base pay for standard roles, while small firms might compensate with equity, bonuses, or rapid promotion potential that could alter total value but not necessarily the stated base pay for the same job type. Critics of the premise often point to efficiency wages or market segmentation, arguing that pay can diverge due to job design, supervision quality, or demand-supply frictions that differ by firm size. Still, when focusing strictly on the same type of job and comparing wage rates alone, the prevailing research tends to support a larger-firm pay advantage.
In sum, the reasoning behind the claim hinges on factors like job standardization, productivity channels, and organizational pay practices that tend to elevate wages at larger firms for equivalent positions, while the counterarguments emphasize contexts where this pattern may be muted or inverted due to unique circumstances or broader compensation structures. The main takeaways emphasize nuance: wage comparisons are sensitive to industry, region, and how compensation is defined (base pay vs. total rewards).

econ_448_120251_246250 Exercise (02/26/2025)

For the same type of job, large firms pay more than small firms.

查看解析

登录即可查看完整答案

类似问题

A construction company offers significantly higher wages to workers assigned to a hazardous job site compared to a similar role in a safer environment. What economic theory best explains this wage differential?

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

Economic stress and unpredictable times have resulted in a booming industry for self-help products

People born without creativity never can develop it

A product has a selling price of $20, a contribution margin ratio of 40% and fixed cost of $120,000. To make a profit of $30,000. The number of units that must be sold is: Type the number without $ and a comma. Eg: 20000

Which of the following statement regarding cost is correct:

Under the assumptions used in cost-volume-profit analysis, as the activity increases:

The CVP and break-even analysis are supported by a range of important assumptions. Which of the following is not an assumption of the CVP:

更多留学生实用工具

考试浏览器助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单