The voting paradox suggests that the "voting market," as represented by elections

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Question restatement: The question asks about the voting paradox and how the voting market, as represented by elections, functions in relation to outcomes compared to the private market for goods and services.
Option 1: 'may not lead to an efficient outcome but certainly leads to a more equitable outcome in terms of distributing goods and services.' This mixes efficiency with equity claims. The voting paradox focuses on inefficiency in matching preferences rather than guaranteeing greater equity; the statement also shifts to distributive justice considerations that aren’t the central point of the paradox. Therefore, this answer blends two concepts in a way that isn’t aligned with the core idea of inefficiency relative to private markets.
Option 2: 'is no different from the private market for goods and services in terms of representing consumer preferences.' This asserts parity between political voting and private markets. However, the voting process is subject to aggregation issues, strategic voting, and collective choice problems that typically prevent it from perfectly representing private preferences, so treating them as the same is inaccurate.
Option 3: 'may often lead to an inefficient outcome in representing consumer preferences compared to the private market for goods and services.' This aligns with the standard view of the voting paradox: elections can fail to efficiently reflect aggregated preferences due to issues likePublic choice dynamics, cycle tendencies, and the divergence between individual valuations and social outcomes. It emphasizes that the collective decision process may produce outcomes that are not the most efficient allocation of resources as compared with the price-driven signals and voluntary exchanges of a private market.
Option 4: 'lead to a superior outcome in representing consumer preferences compared to the private market for goods and services.' This is generally inconsistent with the traditional understanding of the voting paradox, which highlights systematic inefficiencies and distortions in political aggregation rather than a superior representation of preferences relative to markets. It overstates the performance of political mechanisms in comparison to private markets.
In summary, the options present a spectrum from inefficiency and misalignment to mischaracterized parity and a claim of superiority. The core literature on the voting paradox emphasizes that collective decision-making in elections often fails to efficiently represent consumer preferences when contrasted with the more efficient price-driven private market signals. The option that best captures this recognized tension emphasizes potential inefficiency relative to private markets.

econ_102_120251_245827 Lesson 10 Graded Quiz

The voting paradox suggests that the "voting market," as represented by elections

查看解析

登录即可查看完整答案

类似问题

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

Economic stress and unpredictable times have resulted in a booming industry for self-help products

People born without creativity never can develop it

A product has a selling price of $20, a contribution margin ratio of 40% and fixed cost of $120,000. To make a profit of $30,000. The number of units that must be sold is: Type the number without $ and a comma. Eg: 20000

Which of the following statement regarding cost is correct:

Under the assumptions used in cost-volume-profit analysis, as the activity increases:

The CVP and break-even analysis are supported by a range of important assumptions. Which of the following is not an assumption of the CVP:

更多留学生实用工具

考试浏览器助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单