Considering our course discussion, which of the below are correct for an early-stage venture capital investment fund? (select all that apply)

Question

Considering our course discussion, which of the below are correct for an early-stage venture capital investment fund? (select all that apply)

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Question restatement: The prompt asks which statements are correct for an early-stage venture capital investment fund, given a scenario with a select-all-that-apply format.
Option A: 'In an early-stage, 10-investment, fund portfolio target projection, it would be expected that 4 investments go bankrupt (return 0x)'. This aligns with a typical venture capital risk profile where a substantial portion of a diversified early-stage portfolio may fail entirely. With 10 investments, having around 40% as zero-revenue or zero-value outcomes is within common industry heuristics, acknowledging that many startups die or fail to return capital. The calculation follows the idea that a handful of winners are needed to offset losses and still generate overall fund returns. The reasoning hinges on diversification and the high-risk nature of seed/early-stage investing, where a majority can underperform or fail, while a minority drive outsized returns.
Option B: 'An early-stage fund target for an individual company "homerun" return is >10x'. This statement is consistent with venture capital norms where a meaningful portion of a fund’s success is expected to come from a small number of exceptional exits. A >10x multiple on a single company is a common benchmark for a homerun or breakout winner that materially moves the portfolio’s overall performance. VC models often emphasize that such top performers skew the fund’s IRR and multiple-on-invested-capital; aiming for >10x on select investments reflects that reality.
Why alternative statements (if considered) would be wrong: Since there are no additional answer options listed beyond A and B, we cannot critique non-existent choices directly. However, in general, a claim that a majority of investments are expected to return 0x would be overly pessimistic given diversification, while asserting that all successful investments must be >10x would be unrealistically stringent for a balanced portfolio; successful funds typically count a range of outcomes from total loss to modest exits to homeruns.
In summary, both presented statements capture standard early-stage VC expectations: a diversified 10-investment portfolio may include several 0x outcomes, while a few homerun exits (>10x) are essential to achieve attractive overall fund performance.

ES 212 003 FA 2025 Quiz 6

Considering our course discussion, which of the below are correct for an early-stage venture capital investment fund? (select all that apply)

查看解析

登录即可查看完整答案

类似问题

When analyzing deals involving start-ups, VC practitioners set a maximum required rate of return on their equity investment, and then focus on whether the investment generates that return given their exit plan.

In the reading “Designing Corporate Ventures in the Shadow of Private Venture Capital”, the author suggests that CVCs will be more successful if they imitate staged financing similar to independent venture capital funds. (true or false?)

Who are venture capitalists?

According to this article, what percentage of VC investments are from the United States? Please read this article: https://news.crunchbase.com/venture/chinese-startups-lead-us-rivals-in-2018-venture-race/

Which of these is a major player in the VC space?

Pre-seed capital is NOT Venture Capital. True or False?

What is VC money used for? (Check all that apply)

Venture Capital is a public-based market. True or False?

更多留学生实用工具

考试浏览器助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单