A research team is developing a vaccine for a newly discovered virus. However, they find that no known cell lines support replication of the virus. What is the most appropriate conclusion regarding vaccine development?[Fill in the blank]

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The question presents a scenario where a research team cannot find any cell lines that support replication of a newly discovered virus, and asks for the most appropriate conclusion regarding vaccine development. 
Option a: They can proceed with a live-attenuated vaccine using standard passaging techniques. This is not feasible because live-attenuated vaccines require propagation of the virus in cell culture to attenuate it, and since no known cell lines support replication, standard passaging to create attenuation is not possible. Relying on traditional attenuation would be impractical and unsafe given the replication barrier. 
Option b: They can use bacterial culture systems to grow the virus. Bacteria are not suitable hosts for replicating most human or animal viruses, as many viruses require specific eukaryotic cellular machinery. Using bacterial systems would not yield viable virus material for vaccine development and could lead to nonfunctional or misleading results. 
Option c: Whole pathogen vaccines are not feasible; alternative vaccine platforms should be explored. This option correctly recognizes that without a viable system to produce and propagate the virus, whole-pathogen vaccine approaches (which rely on either live or inactivated whole virus) are not feasible. Consequently, exploring alternative platforms (such as subunit, mRNA, vector-based, or other non-replicating strategies) is appropriate. 
Option d: They should consider killed-inactivated vaccines using heat treatment. This would require producing large quantities of the inactivated virus, which again depends on propagating the virus in a suitable system. If no cell lines support replication, producing sufficient material for a killed-inactivated vaccine is not possible, making this option infeasible in practice. 
In summary, options a and d rely on viral production that cannot occur due to the lack of permissive cell lines, option b incorrectly assumes bacteria can culture viruses, and option c accurately reflects the limitation and points toward alternative vaccine platforms as the viable path. The key conceptual takeaway is that vaccine strategies tied to growing the virus in culture are blocked when no appropriate host system exists, so pivoting to non-viral or non-live approaches is the prudent course.

A research team is developing a vaccine for a newly discovered virus. However, they find that no known cell lines support replication of the virus. What is the most appropriate conclusion regarding vaccine development?[Fill in the blank]

查看解析

登录即可查看完整答案

类似问题

In the vaccine development process, what typically occurs in the “Discovery” phase?

How familiar are you with the process of vaccine development and approval?

Listen to this introduction to a lecture about the COVID-19 vaccination, and answer the following questions. Question 7 and 8. Choose A, B or C as the best answer. 7. The purpose of the lecture is to explain:

Listen to this introduction to a lecture about the COVID-19 vaccination, and answer the following questions. Question 7 and 8. Choose A, B or C as the best answer. 7. The purpose of the lecture is to explain:

Listen to this introduction to a lecture about the COVID-19 vaccination, and answer the following questions. Question 7 and 8. Choose A, B or C as the best answer. 7. The purpose of the lecture is to explain:

Listen to this introduction to a lecture about the COVID-19 vaccination, and answer the following questions. Question 7 and 8. Choose A, B or C as the best answer. 7. The purpose of the lecture is to explain:

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

更多留学生实用工具

考试浏览器助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单