How do you model the following situation with a class diagram:A fair is visited by at least one visitor. One visitor visits at least one fair.

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The question asks how to model the scenario using a class diagram. First, notice two key statements: (1) a fair is visited by at least one visitor, and (2) one visitor visits at least one fair. This indicates a many-to-many relationship between Visitor and Fair where participation is required on both sides (no isolated Visitor or Fair without a visit).

Option 1: Use a simple binary association between Visitor and Fair with multiplicities in both directions. If you choose this, you must express total participation constraints so that every Visitor participates in at least one Fair and every Fair has at least one Visitor. In UML, that would be Visitor 1..* on the side to Fair and Fair 1..* on the side to Visitor. However, a bare binary association cannot capture extra information about a visit (like date, time, or location) unless you add attributes to the relationship, which is not directly possible in a pure binary link.

Option 2: Introduce an association class (often named Visit) that links a Visitor and a Fair. This is the standard, clearer approach for this type of scenario. The Visit association class sits on the n-to-m relationship and can carry attributes (visitDate, visitTime, visitorRole, etc.). The multiplicities remain many-to-many (a Visitor can visit many Fairs, and a Fair can have many Visitors), but with the constraint that participation is at least 1 on each side.

Why this fits: The presence of at least one visitor for each fair and at least one fair for each visitor implies total participation constraints, which are naturally expressed by requiring at least one linked Visit instance for every Visitor and every Fair. If you don’t need to store data about the visit itself, you could keep a binary many-to-many with 1..* on both sides, but you would lose the opportunity to attach details about each visit.

Potential pitfalls or misconceptions:
- Modeling as two independent 1..* associations without an intermediate class would not distinctly capture individual visit instances and their attributes.
- Using a binary association with 0..* on either side would allow a visitor or a fair to exist without any visits, violating the stated requirement.
- Forgetting the minimum 1 participation on both sides would misrepresent the problem constraints.

In summary, the recommended modeling is: Visitor and Fair connected via an association class Visit (many-to-many), with Visit capturing any relevant attributes and the multiplicities ensuring that each Visitor participates in at least one Visit and each Fair has at least one Visit.

How do you model the following situation with a class diagram:A fair is visited by at least one visitor. One visitor visits at least one fair.

查看解析

登录即可查看完整答案

类似问题

Match the item from this UML diagram to its description

Which section in the UML holds the list of the class's data attributes?

How do you model the following situation with a class diagram:An order is placed with exactly one waiter, and a waiter can handle multiple orders

Composition, aggregation and association are shown in a :

Which of the following statements is NOT true about the design class diagram (DCD)?[Fill in the blank]

Which of the following would NOT be a reasonable way of identifying the classes for your domain model class diagram?

How do you model the following situation with a class diagram: Every restaurant has at least one kitchen, one kitchen is part of exactly one restaurant

How do you model the following situation with a class diagram:On a blind date exactly two people take part. A person can take part in multiple blind dates.

更多留学生实用工具

考试浏览器助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单