Which of the following statements are true?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

When evaluating the statements, I’ll compare them against what is commonly asserted in discussions of sustainable development and the positions attributed to the Brundtland Commission and the Malaska working group.
Option a: 'In the Brundtland Commission’s report, nature and its preservation are considered to have intrinsic value.' The Brundtland report emphasizes sustainable development as meeting present needs without compromising future generations and stresses the balance of ecological, economic, and social factors. It does not explicitly frame nature and its preservation as having intrinsic value; rather, it emphasizes intergenerational equity and the utility and resilience provided by ecosystems within developmental planning. Therefore, this statement is not aligned with the Brundtland Commission’s emphasis and is likely incorrect.
Option b: 'According to the Brundtland Commission, each country can contribute to sustainable development according to its own interpretation.' The Brundtland framework calls for sustainable development as a global objective, though it recognizes different national circumstances and requires that development meet present needs without compromising the future. However, the wording here suggests a permissive, country-specific interpretation as a core principle, which is not the central message of the Brundtland report. This makes the statement questionable or inaccurate with respect to the Commission’s framing, so it is likely false.
Option c: 'According to the Malaska working group, sustainable development also means mental growth of humans.' The prompt indicates this as a true statement. If the Malaska group defines sustainable development to include human or mental growth, this would reflect a broader, more holistic view that incorporates psychosocial development as part of sustainability. Accepting the provided premise, this option stands as true and captures an expanded conception of wellbeing beyond purely material metrics.
Option d: 'The Malaska working group’s definition highlights the importance of economic growth in solving problems.' If the Malaska group emphasizes mental, social, or ecological dimensions of sustainability, it would not necessarily prioritize economic growth as the sole or primary solution. In many contemporary sustainability discussions, growth is reinterpreted or critiqued rather than elevated as the sole path. Therefore, this option appears inconsistent with a broadened or holistic view and is likely false.
In summary, option c aligns with the statement provided about the Malaska working group and sustainability encompassing mental growth, while options a, b, and d conflict with the typical Brundtland framing or with the broadened Malaska perspective suggested by the question. The reasoning shows why each option diverges from the recognized or implied positions, highlighting the nuances between traditional SD discourse and the Malaska interpretation.

Which of the following statements are true?

查看解析

登录即可查看完整答案

类似问题

What does the following statement best describe: "A responsible society strives to meet its needs without compromising the ability of future generations to meet theirs"?

True or false? The UN’s Sustainable Development Goals are all independent of each other.

SDG 12 (Responsible consumption and production) is the SGD that conflicts with the other SDGs the most.

Which of the following statements are true?

True or false? Finland’s key sustainable development challenges include the fight against climate change, excessive consumption of natural resources, and the development of economics and employment.

更多留学生实用工具

考试浏览器助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单