A key finding of the 2025 World Happiness Report showed that, when society is more benevolent, the people who benefit most are those who are least happy.

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

This statement presents a specific finding from the 2025 World Happiness Report and invites evaluation against typical interpretations of benevolence and happiness.
Option 1: True. If the report indeed claimed that when society is more benevolent, the people who benefit most are those who are least happy, then this option would align with a scenario where social safety nets, kindness, and collective support disproportionately improve outcomes for the most unhappy individuals. Considerations here include how benevolence is defined (policies, cultural norms, charitable actions) and which metrics are used (life satisfaction, mental health indicators, access to basic needs). A true assessment would need to show that the marginal beneficiaries of benevolent actions are the least happy, rather than the moderately happy or most happy, and would specify the mechanism (e.g., reduction of deprivation, social inclusion) by which this occurs.
Option 2: False. If the report’s main finding instead emphasizes broad increases in well-being across a wide portion of the population or highlights other groups receiving the largest gains (such as those in middle happiness levels or in higher-income brackets), then the claim about only the least happy benefiting would be incorrect. In other words, a false interpretation would arise if benevolence yields multi-directional effects or if the most substantial gains occur among different subgroups. Additionally, dynamics like baseline happiness, risk of ceiling effects, or measurement limitations could lead to different conclusions than the statement asserts.
Option 3: It depends on definitions. The truth value hinges on how one defines “benevolent society,” which actors are counted as benefiting, and which happiness or well-being indicators are used. If benevolence is interpreted narrowly (e.g., charitable giving) versus broadly (e.g., inclusive policies, universal basic services), the observed beneficiaries could differ. Therefore, the statement’s truth is not automatic and requires clarification of scope and metrics used in the report.
Option 4: Context matters. Even if some analyses show pronounced gains for the least happy groups, other analyses might reveal that benefits are uneven or that additional factors (economic stability, health care access, social cohesion) influence who benefits most. Thus, dissecting the exact methodology and population segments described in the report is essential to evaluate the claim accurately. This means the statement could be true under certain conditions and false under others, depending on the specific evidence the report presents.

PSYC_V 208 991 2025W1 Quiz 5 - A global happiness report

A key finding of the 2025 World Happiness Report showed that, when society is more benevolent, the people who benefit most are those who are least happy.

查看解析

登录即可查看完整答案

类似问题

What percentage of our feelings of well-being is within our control?

Given what you know about Diener’s research on the relationship between wealth and satisfaction, which of the following represents the correct order of countries ranked from least to most happy?

According to the information in chapter 2 of The How of Happiness, what term do academic researchers prefer to use instead of 'happiness'?

In Chapter 1 of The How of Happiness, what did Neil, the former rock star, say about his happiness level after losing his fame and fortune?

Question at position 14 Which of the following is NOT one of the factors used by researchers as a measure of one’s subjective well-being?positive feelingsinfrequent negative feelingsincomelife satisfaction

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

更多留学生实用工具

考试浏览器助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单