According to Allen, the major difference between martial arts and sport is that martial arts have an external value independent of practice.

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

In this true/false item, we start by understanding what the statement is claiming about Allen's view. 
Option 1: True. The claim suggests that, for Allen, martial arts carry an external value that exists independently of practice, which distinguishes them from sport in this view. Here, we would examine Allen’s distinction between practice-centered activity and the outward value or meaning attributed to martial arts beyond mere repetition or competition. If Allen argues that martial arts embody values or purposes that persist beyond training and competition, then this option would align with that interpretation. 
Option 2: False. This would imply that Allen does not see martial arts as having external value beyond practice, perhaps viewing their value as intrinsic to the act of training or as contingent on performance outcomes. To assess this, we would consider whether Allen emphasizes external justification, cultural significance, ethical meanings, or societal functions that endure outside of practicing or competing. If his position instead centers on internal aspects like personal development during practice, the external-than-practice value claim would be inaccurate. 
Now, evaluating each alternative critically: Option 1 posits an external value that is independent of practice, which requires a reading of Allen that martial arts convey purposes or significances beyond the act of training itself. If such an interpretation is consistent with Allen’s framework, this option would be correct in the sense of capturing that distinctive claim. Conversely, Option 2 would be true only if Allen rejected any external, practice-independent value, arguing that the merit of martial arts is wholly tied to engagement in practice and does not exist outside it. If his view acknowledges external values—such as cultural, philosophical, or ethical dimensions that remain meaningful outside individual practice—then Option 2 would be inconsistent with that reading. 
Consider potential nuances: some theorists differentiate between instrumental value (usefulness in practice) and intrinsic or extrinsic value (meaningful beyond the act). If Allen emphasizes an external value that stands apart from the act of practicing martial arts, the statement would be aligned with that stance; otherwise, if he treats value as emergent only through engagement in practice, the assertion would be false. 
In summary, the correctness hinges on whether Allen attributes an external, practice-independent value to martial arts. If that external value is indeed part of his account, the statement holds; if not, the statement misrepresents his position.

PHIL 220-001 Allen Quiz

According to Allen, the major difference between martial arts and sport is that martial arts have an external value independent of practice.

查看解析

登录即可查看完整答案

类似问题

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

Economic stress and unpredictable times have resulted in a booming industry for self-help products

People born without creativity never can develop it

A product has a selling price of $20, a contribution margin ratio of 40% and fixed cost of $120,000. To make a profit of $30,000. The number of units that must be sold is: Type the number without $ and a comma. Eg: 20000

Which of the following statement regarding cost is correct:

Under the assumptions used in cost-volume-profit analysis, as the activity increases:

The CVP and break-even analysis are supported by a range of important assumptions. Which of the following is not an assumption of the CVP:

The break-even point is that at which:

更多留学生实用工具

考试浏览器助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单