Which of the following best represents the Currency component of the CRAAP test?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

To analyze the options, we first recall that the Currency component of the CRAAP test assesses how up-to-date or current the information is. This helps determine whether the material is still relevant for its topic and whether newer information might exist.
Option 1: 'The qualifications of the author' speaks to Authority, not Currency. It addresses the expertise and credentials of the person or organization behind the information, which is about who wrote it rather than how current it is. 
Option 2: 'The reason why the information was written' pertains to Purpose or Intent. This looks at why the information exists (e.g., to inform, persuade, sell, or debate) and can reveal potential biases, rather than its timeliness. 
Option 3: 'The timeliness of the information' directly ties to Currency. It asks whether the information is recent enough to be trustworthy for the topic at hand and whether it has been updated as needed. This is the core idea behind Currency.
Option 4: 'Whether the information is supported by evidence' relates to Coverage or Relevance of sources, or sometimes to verifiability, but it focuses on the strength of the support rather than how current the material is.
In summary, the statement that best aligns with Currency emphasizes how up-to-date the information remains and whether it still reflects current research or data, rather than who wrote it, why it was written, or how well it is evidenced.

Which of the following best represents the Currency component of the CRAAP test?

查看解析

登录即可查看完整答案

类似问题

What type of source is this article most likely from?

9. Is the statement true or false? “All .edu websites are academic sources”.

3. Which source is most appropriate for a paper on climate change?

Which of the following best describes the purpose of the CRAAP test?

Which one is not a part of the CRAAP test?

Which of the following is not important when considering whether a source might be useful?

You find an article from 1986 that is highly cited. What could be a problem with this source?

更多留学生实用工具

考试浏览器助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单