Question8 Consider an economy with a Cobb-Douglas production function. Assume that the labour income share parameter is 1/3. The economy is producing 100 units of output and the productivity parameter is equal to 1. If the depreciation rate for capital is 6%, investment rate is 6%, and there are 125 workers in the economy. The growth rate in the economy: is equal to zero because the economy is at its steady state. is positive because the economy is below its steady state. cannot be determined. is negative because the economy is above its steady state. ResetMaximum marks: 1 Flag question undefined

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

To assess the growth rate in this Solow-type setting with a Cobb-Douglas production function, we need to connect investment, depreciation, and population (labor force) growth.
Option 1: 'is equal to zero because the economy is at its steady state.' This would only hold if the economy is truly in a steady state with no exogenous technological progress and with population growth accounted for. However, whether we are at steady state cannot be concluded from the data given, because steady state requires balancing investment with effective depreciation plus population growth, which depends on the growth rate of the labor force n. We are not told n, so we cannot assert g = 0.
Option 2: 'is positive because the economy is below its steady state.' If the economy were below its steady state, we would expect positive per-capita or aggregate growth as capital accumulates to reach the steady state. Yet, again, determining whether we are below the steady state hinges on n and the current k level, neither of which is specified with enough precision here. Without n, we cannot confirm this scenario.
Option 3: 'cannot be determined.' This option acknowledges the missing information—the population growth rate (n) or the exogenous rate of technological progress (if any) needed to pin down the steady-state condition and the dynamic growth path. Since the Solow steady-state condition s f(k) = (δ + n) k involves n, and we only know s = 0.06, δ = 0.06, α = 1/3, Y = 100, A = 1, and no n, the growth rate g cannot be uniquely determined from the given data.
Option 4: 'is negative because the economy is above its steady state.' Being above the steady state would drive a negative growth phase (due to disinvestment or capital decumulation) only if we could confirm we are above that level, which again relies on n and the current k. Without those details, this claim cannot be established.
In summary, each of the first, second, and fourth statements relies on information (notably the population growth rate n or the presence of technology growth) that is not provided. Therefore, the only defensible stance given the data is that the growth rate cannot be determined from the information available at hand.

查看解析

登录即可查看完整答案

类似问题

Over the last several decades the observed relationship between capital per worker and real-GDP per worker for the United States was linear. What is the most plausible explanation for this observation?

Question5 Ref. Solow-Swan Model. The steady state is defined as the point where capital accumulation, is equal to the depreciation rate. the saving rate. the population growth rate. zero. the productivity growth rate. ResetMaximum marks: 1 Flag question undefined

更多留学生实用工具

考试浏览器助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单