Why might social mobility be considered more important than addressing income inequality?

A. Social mobility ensures individuals have the opportunity to improve their economic status regardless of initial wealth.
B. Income inequality has no impact on economic growth, making it less relevant.
C. Addressing social mobility directly eliminates the need for wealth redistribution policies.
D. Social mobility reduces the overall tax burden by promoting government austerity measures.

Question

Why might social mobility be considered more important than addressing income inequality?

A. Social mobility ensures individuals have the opportunity to improve their economic status regardless of initial wealth.
B. Income inequality has no impact on economic growth, making it less relevant.
C. Addressing social mobility directly eliminates the need for wealth redistribution policies.
D. Social mobility reduces the overall tax burden by promoting government austerity measures.

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Question restated: Why might social mobility be considered more important than addressing income inequality?

Option A: 'Social mobility ensures individuals have the opportunity to improve their economic status regardless of initial wealth.' This statement highlights a core rationale for prioritizing mobility: it focuses on equal opportunity and the mechanisms that allow improvement regardless of starting point. It aligns with arguments that policies fostering education, skills, and access enable people to rise economically, which many view as a fundamental fairness goal that can coexist with or even complement reducing inequality.

Option B: 'Income inequality has no impact on economic growth, making it less relevant.' This is generally inaccurate. A large body of economic research suggests that high inequality can affect demand, social cohesion, investment, and growth potential. By saying inequality has no impact on growth, this option misstates empirical findings and weakens the case for addressing inequality on economic grounds.

Option C: 'Addressing social mobility directly eliminates the need for wealth redistribution policies.' This claim misconstrues policy relationships. While promoting mobility can reduce persistent inequality, it does not automatically replace wealth redistribution mechanisms such as taxes or transfers. Mobility-enhancing policies and redistribution often operate in complementarity, addressing different dimensions of equity and opportunity.

Option D: 'Social mobility reduces the overall tax burden by promoting government austerity measures.' This is conceptually flawed. Social mobility is about equal opportunity and access to advancement, not about reducing tax revenue or endorsing austerity. Linking mobility to a reduced tax burden through austerity misrepresents how fiscal policy and mobility initiatives interact, and ignores the trade-offs involved in funding public services that enable mobility (like education and healthcare).

In summary, option A correctly frames social mobility as the mechanism by which individuals can improve their economic status regardless of starting conditions, whereas options B, C, and D either misstate empirical evidence, misunderstand policy relationships, or conflate mobility with unrelated fiscal strategies.

ECON&201 15109 Thomas Piketty’s “Capital in the 21st Century"

查看解析

登录即可查看完整答案

类似问题

Which is true of social mobility in a caste system?

Compared to White people, Black people are more likely to experience downward mobility. True or False?

In class, we discussed Social/Income mobility. Based on research we reviewed, we can draw the conclusion that, in general, the location in which a child of low income families grows up has very little effect on their ability to reach significant upward mobility

Gabe came from a working-class family, but through scholarships and part time jobs, he was able to earn an MBA degree and eventually get a job as a corporate executive. This is an example of

______ refers to barriers that keep low-wage workers from ascending from the bottom.

Asian immigrants wanted their children to do well in school because

更多留学生实用工具

考试浏览器助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单