A team-member who does less work than they would if they worked alone might be considered as participating in:

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Question restatement: A team member who does less work than they would if they worked alone might be considered as participating in:

Option 1: staff invalidation. This term would imply undermining or demeaning colleagues, or dismissing their contributions, rather than reduced individual effort within a team. It does not describe someone reducing their own output; thus it’s not aligned with the scenario.

Option 2: decision informity. Decision informity refers to how much information team members have access to when making decisions. It’s about the quality and completeness of information, not about a member’s level of effort or withdrawal from work. Therefore, it does not capture the behavior described.

Option 3: group hiding. The notion of group hiding would suggest a member avoiding visibility or participation within the group for reasons like social dynamics or self-presentation, which could contribute to reduced apparent effort. However, this term is not the standard label for the described phenomenon in most organizational behavior frameworks, though it resembles concepts like social loafing.

Option 4: process hiding. Process hiding concerns concealment of information about process or decisions, or withholding of information needed for others to perform. It’s about information hoarding in the context of groups, not about personal under‑performance relative to solo work.

Option 5: social loafing. This is the classic term for when individuals exert less effort on a task when working in a group than when working alone. The very essence of the scenario—a member doing less work in a group context compared to solo work—maps directly onto social loafing.

Why the others are incorrect in this context: Each of options 1–4 describes behaviors or concepts related to group dynamics that do not specifically capture the drop in an individual’s effort relative to working alone. They involve invalidation, information availability, visibility within the group, or withholding process details, rather than the reduction of personal effort due to group context. The most precise and widely recognized label for reduced individual effort in a group setting is social loafing.

In summary, the behavior described best matches the concept of social loafing, where a team member may contribute less when in a group than they would individually.

2258-1_22MGMT3080007 Test 3

A team-member who does less work than they would if they worked alone might be considered as participating in:

查看解析

登录即可查看完整答案

类似问题

Which of the following is true based on research by Earley (1989) examining cultural differences in social loafing?

Which of the following scenarios best illustrates the phenomenon of social loafing?

How can a coach get his football team to perform better if he suspects they are exhibiting social loafing?

Which of the following is true based on research by Earley (1989) examining cultural differences in social loafing?

A lecturer is designing a group assignment for his class and wants to minimise the potential for social loafing. Which of the following strategies would be an ineffective way for the lecturer to deter social loafing among the student groups?

When a crowd of people clap or cheer, it is difficult to tell just how loud each individual is applauding or cheering. If people tend to clap louder when they are alone than when they are in a crowd, they are probably engaging in _______________.

Your psychology professor has assigned group projects to your class. She has chosen to individually grade each student's contribution to the assignment as an attempt to reduce

更多留学生实用工具

考试浏览器助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单