The major difference between the Sherif (1936) autokinetic effect study (i.e., the dot of light in a dark room study) and the Asch (1952) line studies is the extent to which the situation was what?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Question restatement: The major difference between Sherif (1936) autokinetic effect study (the dot of light in a dark room) and the Asch (1952) line studies is the extent to which the situation was what?

Option 1: Ambiguous
In Sherif's autokinetic task, the participant’s perception of the light’s movement is intrinsically ambiguous, leading individuals to form or align with a group norm to resolve the uncertainty. This ambiguity is central to why conformity emerges in that paradigm.

Option 2: Stressful
While participants may experience some stress in social influence scenarios, the defining contrast between these studies is not primarily about stress levels. Asch’s task is known for social pressure to conform, but the core distinction highlighted in literature is about ambiguity of the stimulus rather than stress alone.

Option 3: Social
Both studies involve social context, so labeling the difference primarily as social does not capture the unique methodological contrast. The Asch study is famous for demonstrating normative conformity under social pressure, whereas Sherif’s study emphasizes how group norms emerge to resolve ambiguity.

Option 4: Rewarded
The studies do not center on rewards or incentives as the primary mechanism driving behavior. There is no emphasis on reinforcement or rewards as the key difference between the two experiments.

Expanded reasoning:
- For Ambiguous: This option aligns with the historical interpretation that Sherif’s experiment manipulated perceptual ambiguity to study how individuals converge on a group norm when a clear correct answer is not available. The lack of an objective correct answer creates a situation where social influence serves to reduce uncertainty. 
- For Stressful: Although social situations can be stressful, the core theoretical takeaway from comparing these studies is not about stress magnitude, but about whether the task itself provides a clear correct solution. Stress would not be the best descriptor of the Sherif task’s distinguishing feature. 
- For Social: The presence of others and the desire to fit in is a feature of both experiments; the difference lies in whether there is ambiguity needing a norm to emerge, rather than simply the social context. 
- For Rewarded: There is no discussion of rewards driving performance or conformity in the primary contrast between these studies, making this option not aligned with the established distinction.

Synthesis: The most accurate interpretation of the key difference centers on the ambiguity of the task in Sherif’s study compared to the unambiguous, clearly correct judgments in Asch’s line-judgment paradigm, which is what makes the first option the focal contrast in the classic comparison.

PSYC260.001.SP25 260 Exam 02 Sp25

The major difference between the Sherif (1936) autokinetic effect study (i.e., the dot of light in a dark room study) and the Asch (1952) line studies is the extent to which the situation was what?

查看解析

登录即可查看完整答案

类似问题

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

Economic stress and unpredictable times have resulted in a booming industry for self-help products

People born without creativity never can develop it

A product has a selling price of $20, a contribution margin ratio of 40% and fixed cost of $120,000. To make a profit of $30,000. The number of units that must be sold is: Type the number without $ and a comma. Eg: 20000

Which of the following statement regarding cost is correct:

Under the assumptions used in cost-volume-profit analysis, as the activity increases:

The CVP and break-even analysis are supported by a range of important assumptions. Which of the following is not an assumption of the CVP:

更多留学生实用工具

考试浏览器助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单