Which of the following approaches to studying social cognition proposes that we can think in a rapid and automatic way?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

To tackle the question, we first consider what each theoretical approach says about how people think in social contexts.
Option 1: 'Naïve scientist only' This view portrays people as highly analytical, systematic, and driven by data to form accurate social judgments. It emphasizes slow, deliberate processing rather than rapid, automatic thinking, so it does not primarily center on fast, automatic cognition.
Option 2: 'Cognitive miser only' The cognitive miser idea highlights that people tend to conserve mental effort and rely on quick, heuristic shortcuts when forming impressions or making inferences. This strongly aligns with rapid, automatic processing in many everyday social judgments, making this a key candidate for the described property.
Option 3: 'Motivated tactician only' The motivated tactician model posits that people can flexibly shift between quick or deliberate processing depending on goals and motivation. While it does include rapid thinking, it emphasizes strategic control and purpose-driven adjustments rather than a default endorsement of automatic processing alone.
Option 4: 'Cognitive miser + Motivated tactician' This combined perspective explicitly acknowledges that people can engage in fast, automatic processing (cognitive miser) but also deploy more effortful, controlled processing when goals or accuracy demands arise (motivated tactician). It captures the idea that rapid thinking can occur within a broader framework that includes strategic, goal-directed shifts in processing.
In terms of identifying which option aligns with the notion of rapid, automatic thinking, option 2 accurately reflects the core of the cognitive miser view. However, if the question aims to capture the most comprehensive account that explicitly allows both rapid and controlled processing depending on context, option 4 would be the inclusive choice. The remaining options either describe a single, one-sided stance or fail to emphasize the automatic aspect as central.
Thus, considering the emphasis on rapid, automatic thinking and the broader explanatory power, the options differ in scope: the cognitive miser perspective centers on automatic processing, the motivated tactician introduces context-driven control, and their combination acknowledges both modes. The nuanced takeaway is that both cognitive miser and motivated tactician contribute to understanding rapid versus controlled processing in social cognition, with the combined approach offering the most complete account.

Which of the following approaches to studying social cognition proposes that we can think in a rapid and automatic way?

查看解析

登录即可查看完整答案

类似问题

In meta-perceptions that are centered on thinking about other people, ______ exemplifies that we overestimate what is happening in other people’s minds.

When perceiving others, while people often rely on automatic information processing, they are capable of processing information more systematically. Which are essential requirements for this to occur?

An aggressive boy's interpretation of an encounter as hostile and his classmates' perception of his behavior as inappropriate illustrate_____ in behavior development.

Which of the following approaches to studying social cognition proposes that we can think in a rapid and automatic way?

When Aristide is getting to know a new person, they ask about their membership to different political groups. Regardless of the person's personality, Aristide bases their opinion on the person's political affiliation. This is an example of:

Which of the following is an example of an actual finding related to social cognition?

How does the Telephone Game support the double empathy problem theory?

更多留学生实用工具

考试浏览器助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单