According to current observations the majority of all shipping-related emissions originate from international transport of cargo. If emissions of recreational, military and other shipping are omitted from the results it can be concluded that

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The prompt asks us to evaluate a conclusion drawn from observed shipping emissions, specifically when recreational, military, and other shipping emissions are omitted.
First, restate the core idea: if the majority of shipping-related emissions come from international transport, and we exclude certain categories (recreational, military, etc.), one might conclude that emissions from international shipping dwarf domestic shipping emissions.
Now, assess the provided option: 'emissions due to international shipping are about 3.6 times higher compared to domestic shipping.'
- This statement asserts a quantitative ratio between international and domestic shipping emissions. If international transport accounts for the lion’s share of emissions, a substantial multiple over domestic emissions is plausible. The exact factor (3.6x) would depend on the underlying data: the relative magnitudes of international vs. domestic cargo movement, fuel intensity, fleet efficiency, and routing patterns.
- A correct interpretation would require knowing the dataset or study definitions: which emissions are counted (CO2e, scope boundaries), whether ballast or idle-time emissions are included, and how domestic routes are defined geographically. Without those details, saying a precise 3.6x is an estimate rather than an ontological truth.
- The logical core is that international shipping emits more than domestic shipping, given it typically covers longer distances, larger volumes, and more fuel burn per trip. The statement captures this directional relationship, but the exact multiplier is contingent on the data source.
- Potential caveats: if the dataset excludes certain domestic activities or if there are large domestic routes with unexpectedly high emissions, the ratio could differ. Additionally, if the observed majority is a result of data weighting or categorization, the conclusion could be biased.
- In summary, the claim that international shipping emissions are significantly higher than domestic emissions aligns with the general understanding that international transport drives a large share of shipping emissions. The specific figure (3.6x) may be reasonable in some datasets, but it is not universally guaranteed without referencing the particular data and methodology used.
- Since no other answer options are provided to compare alternatives, we focus on whether the statement is a plausible concise conclusion from the stated premise rather than asserting it as an absolute universal fact.

Climate Action – Solutions for Carbon Neutral Transport Shipping trends

According to current observations the majority of all shipping-related emissions originate from international transport of cargo. If emissions of recreational, military and other shipping are omitted from the results it can be concluded that

查看解析

登录即可查看完整答案

类似问题

Approximately what percentage of global GHG emissions come from shipping?

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

Economic stress and unpredictable times have resulted in a booming industry for self-help products

People born without creativity never can develop it

A product has a selling price of $20, a contribution margin ratio of 40% and fixed cost of $120,000. To make a profit of $30,000. The number of units that must be sold is: Type the number without $ and a comma. Eg: 20000

Which of the following statement regarding cost is correct:

Under the assumptions used in cost-volume-profit analysis, as the activity increases:

The CVP and break-even analysis are supported by a range of important assumptions. Which of the following is not an assumption of the CVP:

更多留学生实用工具

考试浏览器助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单