Question at position 1 What do you need to consider when deciding whether an act is sexual harassment or not? Consider the following factors Whether the alleged harasser is a man or a woman Whether a reasonable person, having regard to all the circumstances, would have anticipated the act would offend or intimidate the complainant. Whether the victim himself/herself finds the act unwelcome 1 & 22 & 31 & 3

Question

Question at position 1  What do you need to consider when deciding whether an act is sexual harassment or not? Consider the following factors Whether the alleged harasser is a man or a woman Whether a reasonable person, having regard to all the circumstances, would have anticipated the act would offend or intimidate the complainant. Whether the victim himself/herself finds the act unwelcome 1 & 22 & 31 & 3

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

When reviewing what to consider in deciding whether an act constitutes sexual harassment, we must parse the listed factors and evaluate their relevance.
Option 1: '1 & 2' combines factor 1 (whether the harasser is a man or a woman) with factor 2 (whether a reasonable person would have anticipated the act would offend or intimidate the complainant). The gender of the harasser is not a determiner of harassment in most frameworks; what matters is the impact and the surrounding circumstances, not the harasser’s gender. Therefore, including factor 1 is misplaced, making this option incomplete or inaccurate by including an irrelevant factor.
Option 2: '2 & 3' pairs factor 2 (a reasonable person, having regard to all the circumstances, would have anticipated the act would offend or intimidate the complainant) with factor 3 (whether the victim themselves finds the act unwelcome). These two factors align with standard harassment assessments: a reasonable person standard plus the explicit perception of the victim. Together, they capture both objective and subjective elements of harassment, making this combination appropriate and correct in many legal and organizational frameworks.
Option 3: '1 & 3' pairs factor 1 (harasser’s gender) with factor 3 (victim’s unwelcome perception). While the victim’s unwelcome experience is relevant, pairing it with the harasser’s gender again introduces an extraneous criterion that isn’t central to determining whether an act is sexual harassment. This makes the option incomplete because it omits the objective reasonable-person consideration that helps assess whether conduct is harassing in context.
In summary, the critical distinctions lie in recognizing that the gender of the harasser is generally not a determining factor, while both the objective reasonable-person standard and the victim’s own unwelcome perception are essential. Hence, option 2 (2 & 3) properly reflects the relevant factors, whereas options 1 & 2 and 1 & 3 either include irrelevant elements or omit key, pertinent criteria.

查看解析

登录即可查看完整答案

类似问题

Repeated unwanted comments/jokes based on one's gender identity, or gender expression, is a form of what? (Select one)

Question at position 15 Q15 Internship (same-sex sexual harassment)YesNo

Question at position 5 Which of the following is correct? Only gay men will sexually harass a manA single incident may amount to sexual harassmentIf a person did not try to fight their harasser off, then it was not sexual harassment

Question at position 4 Which can be a defense against an allegation of sexual harassment? The complainant wore a skimpy outfit which means she invited sexual attentionI was just joking when I made the sexual remarksNone of the above

Question at position 2 What is the two-step test for deciding whether a conduct is sexual harassment?Subjective Test & Objective TestSubject Test & Objection TestSubjective Test & Stanford Marshmallow Test

更多留学生实用工具

考试浏览器助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单