Which of the following is true when performing machine translation using a sequence to sequence model

Hint Refer to Lecture 17

Question

Which of the following is true when performing machine translation using a sequence to sequence model

Hint Refer to Lecture 17

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Question restatement: Which of the following is true when performing machine translation using a sequence to sequence model? Options: A) The order of the inputs to the model determines the order of the outputs. B) The input may be presented either in left to right order or in right to left order, as long as the same order is used for all inputs.

Option A analysis: The claim that input order determines output order suggests a direct one-to-one correspondence where swapping input elements would swap output elements in the same way. In a standard seq2seq translation setup, the encoder reads the entire input sentence to produce a context representation, and the decoder generates the target sentence left to right based on that context. While the content and structure of the input influence the produced translation, the notion that the input order dictates the exact order of outputs is an overstatement; the decoder’s step-by-step generation is governed by its own internal state and the learned mapping from source to target, not a simple positional mirroring of input order. Therefore, this statement captures only a superficial or misleading intuition and would generally be considered incorrect.

Option B analysis: The idea that the input may be presented left-to-right or right-to-left, provided the same order is used consistently, aligns with a known technique in sequence-to-sequence models. Reversing the input sequence has been shown to improve gradient flow and early alignment between source and target in some architectures (notably with RNN-based encoders like LSTMs), and many papers and lecture materials discuss using a reversed input sequence as a valid or even beneficial variant. The key caveat is that training and decoding should be consistent with the chosen input order across all samples, so the model learns the same mapping under that order. This statement reflects a valid and commonly discussed practice in seq2seq setups.

Additional considerations: If one mistakenly assumes that input order must be fixed and cannot be reversed, they may miss the empirical benefit observed in some experiments. Conversely, claiming that input order rigidly determines output order ignores the encoder–decoder dynamics and the probabilistic nature of sequence generation. Being aware of these nuances helps clarify why option B is the more accurate statement in the context of standard seq2seq machine translation practice.

In summary, Option A presents a misleading absolutist view about input and output ordering, while Option B describes a legitimate and commonly employed variation in input processing that remains valid as long as consistency is maintained across all inputs.

11785/11685/11485 Quiz-09

Which of the following is true when performing machine translation using a sequence to sequence model Hint Refer to Lecture 17

查看解析

登录即可查看完整答案

类似问题

What is an example of a many-to-many sequence modeling task?

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

Economic stress and unpredictable times have resulted in a booming industry for self-help products

People born without creativity never can develop it

A product has a selling price of $20, a contribution margin ratio of 40% and fixed cost of $120,000. To make a profit of $30,000. The number of units that must be sold is: Type the number without $ and a comma. Eg: 20000

Which of the following statement regarding cost is correct:

Under the assumptions used in cost-volume-profit analysis, as the activity increases:

更多留学生实用工具

考试浏览器助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单