题目
题目

PSYC20007_2025_SM2 Supplementary or Special Exam: Cognitive Psychology (PSYC20007_2025_SM2)- Requires Respondus LockDown Browser

单项选择题

Eriksen and St James (1986) argued that performance on the Eriksen flanker task is best explained by:

选项
A.A capacity theory, in which targets and flankers both compete for a single source of capacity, which increases RT with incompatible flankers.
B.A late selection theory, in which incompatible flankers are processed by a limited capacity channel, which increases RT.
C.A zoom lens model, in which incompatible flankers are processed during an initial “zoomed out” stage, increasing RT with incompatible flankers.
D.A two-stage model in which nontarget items are rejected during an initial parallel scan of the display, increasing RT with incompatible flankers.
查看解析

查看解析

标准答案
Please login to view
思路分析
To analyze Eriksen and St James (1986) on the Eriksen flanker task, we must compare competing theoretical accounts of how flankers influence reaction time and accuracy. Option A states a capacity theory where targets and flankers compete for a single pool of cognitive resources, predicting longer RTs with incompatible flankers due to limited capacity. However, this interpretation does not capture the key proposal of Eriksen and St James, which emphasizes flexible allocation of attention rather than a single, undifferentiated capacity bottleneck.......Login to view full explanation

登录即可查看完整答案

我们收录了全球超50000道考试原题与详细解析,现在登录,立即获得答案。

类似问题

In an experiment by Moray (1970), people detected signals consisting of small increases in the intensities of pure tones presented to one or both ears. Detection performance was poorer when tones were presented to both ears and was particularly bad when two signals occurred simultaneously. Moray argued that these results were most consistent with:

Gray and Wedderburn’s (1960) “Dear Aunt Jane” experiment was a problem for filter theory because:

In Broadbent’s “split span” experiments, he found that people prefer to recall two dichotically presented sets of digits on an “ear by ear” basis. Broadbent interpreted this preference as indicating:

In an experiment by McKay (1973), people shadowed ambiguous sentences like They threw stones towards the bank”, while words like “money” or “river” were presented on the unattended channel. In a subsequent recognition test, they were more likely to pick as familiar a sentence whose meaning was related to the word that had been presented on the unattended channel. This finding was interpreted as evidence for:

更多留学生实用工具

加入我们，立即解锁 海量真题 与 独家解析，让复习快人一步！