If the price of peanut butter increases, the demand for jelly will decrease. This shifter of demand is known as

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The question asks about a shifter of demand: If the price of peanut butter increases, the demand for jelly will decrease.
First, restating the scenario: jelly and peanut butter are typically consumed together, so an increase in the price of peanut butter makes people buy less peanut butter and, as a result, jelly purchases also fall. This illustrates a change in demand for jelly due to a related good's price change.
Option analysis:
- Correct concept to name: This relationship is due to jelly and peanut butter being complements. When the price of one (peanut butter) rises, the other (jelly) experiences lower demand because they are often used together. Hence, the underlying shifter is the price of related goods, specifically the price of the complement. The most precise label would be "complements" (a type of related good) rather than a generic umbrella such as simply "price of related goods."
- If we interpret the phrase "price of related goods" broadly, it could refer to substitutes or complements. In this case, the relevant related good is a complement, because the price change in peanut butter affects the demand for jelly in the opposite direction.
- Because the question’s prompt includes an answer choice labeled as "price of related goods" (as provided in the data), you might be tempted to pick that as the shifter. While technically capturing the category of related goods, it lacks the specificity that distinguishes complements from substitutes. The more accurate description would be that the shifter is the price of a related good, specifically the price of peanut butter, which acts as a complement to jelly.
- If there were other options such as "price of substitutes," "income," or "tastes and preferences," we would evaluate them accordingly. Here, the observed cross-price effect (increase in PB price reduces jelly demand) points to complements, not substitutes or income effects.
- Potential misconceptions: Some students might think only substitutes affect cross-price effects, leading to confusion. Remember, cross-price effects apply to both substitutes and complements; the sign of the effect tells you which type you’re dealing with. Positive cross-price elasticity indicates substitutes; negative cross-price elasticity indicates complements.
- In summary, the phenomenon described is caused by jelly and peanut butter being complements. The most precise label for the shifter is the price of related goods in the context of complements, though the given option loosely captures the general idea if interpreted as related goods. The key takeaway is recognizing the negative cross-price effect characteristic of complements.

SOC-ECONB Value & Demand

If the price of peanut butter increases, the demand for jelly will decrease. This shifter of demand is known as

查看解析

登录即可查看完整答案

类似问题

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

Economic stress and unpredictable times have resulted in a booming industry for self-help products

People born without creativity never can develop it

A product has a selling price of $20, a contribution margin ratio of 40% and fixed cost of $120,000. To make a profit of $30,000. The number of units that must be sold is: Type the number without $ and a comma. Eg: 20000

Which of the following statement regarding cost is correct:

Under the assumptions used in cost-volume-profit analysis, as the activity increases:

The CVP and break-even analysis are supported by a range of important assumptions. Which of the following is not an assumption of the CVP:

The break-even point is that at which:

更多留学生实用工具

考试浏览器助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单