In paragraph 3, the authors claim:

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Question restatement: In paragraph 3, the authors claim:

Answer options:
A. Two conflicting theories are both true.
B. Their theory is backed by evidence.
C. Time spent reading is the most important factor for reading growth.

Option A: 'Two conflicting theories are both true.' Consider whether the authors present a stance that multiple theories can be simultaneously valid. If paragraph 3 emphasizes a single theory or presents evidence supporting one view, this option would misrepresent the authors’ position by suggesting a plurality or coexistence of conflicting theories. Additionally, the language of 'conflicting' implies a rivalry between theories, which readers should verify against the text’s tone and conclusions. Unless the paragraph explicitly argues for tensions or equivalence between two competing theories, this choice is unlikely to reflect the authors’ claim.

Option B: 'Their theory is backed by evidence.' This option asserts that the authors support their theory with evidence, which is a common and plausible claim in a scholarly paragraph. To assess this, check whether paragraph 3 presents data, experiments, citing studies, or logical rationale that strengthen the theory. If such evidence is described or referenced, this option aligns with a typical authorial move to bolster a theory with empirical or logical support.

Option C: 'Time spent reading is the most important factor for reading growth.' Evaluate whether the paragraph makes a sweeping claim about time investment as the primary driver of reading growth. If paragraph 3 discusses multiple contributing factors (such as strategy use, prior knowledge, practice quality) or downplays time as the sole determinant, this option would misstate the authors’ emphasis. It would reflect a narrow or reductive view unless the text explicitly elevates time spent as the paramount factor.

Cross-option comparison: If the text in paragraph 3 explicitly states that the theory is supported by evidence, option B is the accurate characterization. If the paragraph instead highlights the presence of evidence for another idea or stresses that reading growth is influenced by several factors rather than time alone, option C would be less accurate. If the paragraph discusses competing theories as both true or portrays a tension between viewpoints, option A would be worth considering, though it would require textual support to claim coexistence of conflicting theories. The most direct route is to match the described content of paragraph 3 with the specific claim being made about evidence, emphasis, or theoretical stance.

Why option B could be correct and others not: If the authors present data, experiments, or cited sources in paragraph 3 to substantiate their theory, that directly supports the claim that their theory is backed by evidence. This aligns with standard academic practice of grounding theoretical claims in observable or derivable support. In contrast, options A and C introduce scenarios (coexisting conflicting theories or claiming time spent as the sole driver) that would require explicit textual support about coexistence or exclusive emphasis; without such support, these choices misrepresent the authors’ stated claim.

Why alternatives might be inaccurate: For option A, missing textual cues about theory rivalry or mutual truth would render it inconsistent with a typical paragraph that argues for one position with evidence. For option C, claims about time being the most important factor would require the paragraph to dismiss other factors or to elevate time as paramount, which should be explicitly stated; lacking that, C would misstate the authors’ nuanced position if they discuss multiple influences.

Summary reflection: In evaluating paragraph 3, the statement about evidence (option B) is the most plausible alignment if the authors point to data or reasoning supporting their theory. The other options rely on claims about coexistence of theories or singular causal emphasis that would need direct textual support to be accurate.

ME Mod4 Intake 2A - 14 Apr 2025 - 4 Jul 2025 Activity 7.2A - Practice Reading Quiz 4

In paragraph 3, the authors claim:

查看解析

登录即可查看完整答案

类似问题

What was surprising about the cost of constructing 5-Star homes?

What is stated in the first paragraph?

Which of the following statements best summarises the writer’s perspective on sustainable building practices?

According to the writer, what role does education play in solving the housing crisis?

What is the main point that paragraph 1 is making?

Which of the following best represents the authors’ recommendation?

In paragraph 3, the authors claim:

According to the text:

更多留学生实用工具

考试浏览器助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单