According to Modood, the Danish cartoons depicting Muhammad are not racist.

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Reviewing the statement in light of Modood's work on race, multiculturalism, and the politics of representation prompts a careful evaluation of both options.
Option 1: 'True' — If one claimed that Modood says the Danish cartoons depicting Muhammad are not racist, this would run counter to many discussions in his scholarship that highlight how caricatures of religious or racialized groups can reinforce stereotypes and contribute to prejudice. The claim would require a gloss that these cartoons are merely free expression without racist implications, which does not align with Modood’s analyses of how race and religion intersect with social power and representation. The flaw here is overlooking the ways in which such depictions can be read as reinforcing negative essentialisms and excluding Muslims from equal civic belonging.
Option 2: 'False' — This aligns with a common scholarly stance that such cartoons, given the history of anti-Muslim imagery and the social impact of portraying a minority group in stereotypical or provocatively negative ways, can be interpreted as racist or at least as participating in racialized/religious othering. The reasoning emphasizes that racism encompasses more than explicit hateful slurs; it includes denigrating portrayals that reinforce social hierarchies and exclusion. In this view, Modood would likely critique the cartoons as contributing to racialized discourse and thus not be neutral or non-racist in intent or effect.
Option 1's premise collapses if the expectation is that Modood denies any racialized impact of such imagery, whereas Option 2 captures the interpretation that such depictions can be racist or racially charged. The central misconception in Option 1 is assuming a stance that equates provocative satire with non-racist messaging, ignoring the broader scholarly context about representation, power, and minority status.
Option 2 makes explicit the position that the cartoons can function within racist frames, which is consistent with Modood's emphasis on how cultural representations relate to race, religion, and social inclusion. The incorrectness of Option 2 would require arguing that caricatured depictions are devoid of racist effect or intention, which would be a narrower view than Modood’s broader discussion of representation and racialized discourse.
In summary, Option 1 oversimplifies or misinterprets the political and social dynamics at play in such depictions, while Option 2 reflects a more accurate reading of Modood’s approach to race, religion, and representation. The distinction hinges on whether one views the cartoons as harmless expression or as contributing to racialized stereotypes and exclusion.

PHIL 220-001 Modood Quiz

According to Modood, the Danish cartoons depicting Muhammad are not racist.

查看解析

登录即可查看完整答案

类似问题

A specific form of prejudice based on socially significant, physically inherited characteristics is:

What does the Australian Human Rights Commission define as 'racism'?

One of the explanations for continued racism in the United States is that we have

A belief that members of a one race are superior to those of other races is called:

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

Economic stress and unpredictable times have resulted in a booming industry for self-help products

People born without creativity never can develop it

A product has a selling price of $20, a contribution margin ratio of 40% and fixed cost of $120,000. To make a profit of $30,000. The number of units that must be sold is: Type the number without $ and a comma. Eg: 20000

更多留学生实用工具

考试浏览器助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单