Which framework is primarily used to comprehensively evaluate the public health impact of an intervention program?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

When choosing a framework to evaluate the public health impact of an intervention program, it helps to consider what each framework emphasizes.
Option 1: RE-AIM. This framework explicitly targets public health impact by examining five dimensions—Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance—allowing a comprehensive assessment of how well an intervention works in real-world settings and its sustainability. It is widely used for evaluating public health programs end-to-end.
Option 2: CFIR (Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research). CFIR is a robust framework for understanding implementation processes and contextual factors that influence whether an intervention is adopted and how well it is implemented, but it focuses more on the implementation process itself rather than directly measuring population-level public health impact outcomes across spaces and time.
Option 3: EPIS (Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment). EPIS provides a lifecycle perspective on implementation phases, emphasizing temporal stages and the fit between contexts and interventions, but like CFIR, its primary strength is the implementation journey rather than a structured, multi-outcome public health impact assessment.
Option 4: ERIC (Expert Recommendations for Interventions). ERIC is a compilation of implementation strategies and expert recommendations to facilitate uptake, rather than a framework that organizes and interprets impact dimensions across reach, effectiveness, adoption, maintenance, and so forth.
Therefore, the framework that most directly targets and integrates the public health impact across multiple outcomes and settings is the one that explicitly names the impact dimensions in its structure (reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, maintenance), guiding comprehensive evaluation across the program’s lifespan.

KNHES 4525 AU2025 (11047) Exam 2

Which framework is primarily used to comprehensively evaluate the public health impact of an intervention program?

查看解析

登录即可查看完整答案

类似问题

If an intervention fails to produce the expected results, but the process evaluation shows that it was delivered as planned, this suggests:

The dental hygienist's role in public health in evaluating program via index and community evaluations is:

Which of the following was a reason for the RE-AIM framework to be developed?

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

Economic stress and unpredictable times have resulted in a booming industry for self-help products

更多留学生实用工具

考试浏览器助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单