Why do Jo and Cam believe the precautionary principle might prevent innovation?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Question restatement: Why do Jo and Cam believe the precautionary principle might prevent innovation?

Option A: It costs too much. This answer focuses on economic cost as a barrier. While expensive initiatives can impede experimentation, the precautionary principle is typically discussed in terms of risk and the burden of proof rather than cost alone. So costliness is not the core rationale used to argue it might hamper innovation in this context.

Option B: It lacks a scientific basis. This option points to a foundational critique of the precautionary principle: if the principle is invoked without solid scientific certainty, it can stall new ideas by demanding proof before any action. This aligns with common criticisms that precautionary reasoning may hinder progress when evidence is uncertain or incomplete, thereby potentially slowing innovative efforts.

Option C: It doesn’t provide advantages. This statement asserts there are no benefits to the precautionary principle. In debates about risk management, proponents argue that it offers advantages like protecting public health or the environment by preventing harmful experiments. Dismissing all benefits overlooks these intended protective aims, making this option overly absolute and not usually supported in nuanced discussions.

Summary analysis: A is about cost and is a tangential critique rather than the central argument linked to innovation suppression via precautionary reasoning. B directly addresses the concern that the precautionary principle could impede innovative activity due to demands for robust scientific justification before proceeding. C denies any benefits, which conflicts with arguments that the principle seeks to avoid irreversible harm, even if those arguments are contested. The reasoning behind the belief that precautionary approaches might hinder innovation most closely corresponds to the lack of a solid scientific basis for triggering precautionary limits and thus slowing novel ventures, which is captured by option B.

Why do Jo and Cam believe the precautionary principle might prevent innovation?

查看解析

登录即可查看完整答案

类似问题

Why does Cam discuss the movie Erin Brokovitch?

Why does Cam discuss the movie Erin Brokovitch?

The lecturer is careful to point out that the precautionary principle

In the 1970s, the German government imposed restrictions on power plants

Why does Cam discuss the movie Erin Brokovitch?

What did Cam understand from this lecture?

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

Economic stress and unpredictable times have resulted in a booming industry for self-help products

更多留学生实用工具

考试浏览器助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单