Consider the following exchange:

Ava: I reserved a table for us at Chez Pierre tomorrow at 7 pm.

Bo: My sister is visiting from Vancouver.

(Inference: Bo is unable to have dinner with Ava)

Based on your reading of chapter 8.5, which of Grice's maxims best accounts for the fact that Ava naturally infers from Bo's statement that Bo will not be able to join her for dinner?

Question

Consider the following exchange:

Ava: I reserved a table for us at Chez Pierre tomorrow at 7 pm.

Bo: My sister is visiting from Vancouver.

(Inference: Bo is unable to have dinner with Ava)

Based on your reading of chapter 8.5, which of Grice's maxims best accounts for the fact that Ava naturally infers from Bo's statement that Bo will not be able to join her for dinner?

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

In this question, we examine Gricean maxims and how they guide inference in conversation.
Option 1: Maxim of Quantity. This maxim is about providing as much information as is needed and not more than is necessary. While it often guides how informative a contribution should be, it does not directly explain why Ava infers Bo cannot join her. It would address whether Bo’s statement contains enough information, but not the specific inference about Bo’s availability.
Option 2: Maxim of Quality. This maxim concerns not saying what you believe to be false or providing information without sufficient evidence. Since Bo’s remark about his sister visiting is not a claim about truth value in terms of deception or evidence, this maxim does not capture the inferential jump Ava makes regarding Bo’s dinner plans.
Option 3: Maxim of Relation. This is the principle of being relevant: contributions should be pertinent to the topic under discussion. Ava’s inference that Bo cannot join her follows from the expectation of relevance: Bo’s statement about his sister visiting is relevant information affecting dinner plans, and Ava reads that as a constraint on Bo’s ability to attend. The relevance principle explains why Ava would infer Bo cannot be at dinner.
Option 4: Maxim of Manner. This maxim deals with clarity: avoid obscurity, be orderly, and so on. While it could influence how information is presented, it does not specifically account for the inference that Bo will not be able to join based on the content of his reply.
Thus, among the options, the Maxim of Relation best accounts for why Ava infers Bo will not be able to join, because the utterance about a sister visiting is relevant to Bo’s availability for the planned dinner. The other maxims either address the amount of information, truth conditions, or clarity, but do not directly explain the inference about Bo’s attendance.

LIN102H5 S All Sections TUT11 preparation (Mar.31)

查看解析

登录即可查看完整答案

类似问题

John has the ability to talk informally with his friends and more formally to his teachers during class. Clearly John understands the _____.

German colleague's "we'll talk about this later", means:

Meanings are in people, not words and gestures.

According to lecture, ________________ considers the context in which words are used.

Tim seems to have meant one thing with his question "Pat, do you want to email Professor Liu about it?", but Pat seems to have understood it differently. Pat likely understood it in what way?

Tim seems to have meant one thing with his question "Pat, do you want to email Professor Liu about it?", but Pat seems to have understood it differently. What did Tim probably mean?

According to the Cooperative Principle, what would we expect an adult discourse participant to generally do if another discourse participant appears to be violating a maxim?

According to Maxim of Quantity, being under-informative in a conversation is uncooperative, but being over-informative is cooperative, because over-informative statements provide sufficient information.

更多留学生实用工具

考试浏览器助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单