Your client requests a portfolio with zero Environmental Risk. They are interested in two Exchange Trade Funds and will allow you to short one of the ETFs. What is the weight in the first ETF if you create a zero Environmental Risk with a negative weight in the second ETF. The first ETF's Environmental Score is 2.3 and the second ETFs score is 11. (Answer in % to one decimal place, 40.5% is 40.5)

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

To tackle this problem, I’ll restate what’s being asked and identify the key constraints.
We want a zero Environmental Risk for the portfolio, using two ETFs where the second is allowed to have a negative weight (i.e., a short position). The first ETF has an Environmental Score of 2.3, the second has a score of 11, and we need the weight of the first ETF in percent (to one decimal place).
First, set up the two fundamental equations that reflect the constraints of a zero-risk portfolio:
1) The weights must sum to 1 (assuming a fully invested portfolio): w1 + w2 = 1.
2) The environmental risk contributed by the portfolio must be zero: 2.3*w1 + 11*w2 = 0.
Now solve the system. From equation (1), w2 = 1 − w1.
Substitute into equation (2): 2.3*w1 + 11*(1 − w1) = 0.
Expand and collect like terms: 2.3*w1 + 11 − 11*w1 = 0 → (2.3 − 11)*w1 + 11 = 0 → (−8.7)*w1 = −11.
Divide both sides by −8.7: w1 = 11 / 8.7 ≈ 1.264367…
Convert to a percentage by multiplying by 100: about 126.4367%, which rounds to 126.4% when you report to one decimal place.
For completeness, the corresponding w2 is 1 − w1 ≈ 1 − 1.264367 ≈ −0.264367, i.e., about −26.4%, which is consistent with the description of a negative weight (short position) in the second ETF.
Key checks: the math satisfies both constraints (w1 + w2 = 1 and 2.3*w1 + 11*w2 = 0), and the rounding aligns with the requested one-decimal-place format.
In summary, solving the linear system yields a first-ETF weight of approximately 126.4%, with the second ETF carrying about −26.4%.

FINA3401.13791.202610

查看解析

登录即可查看完整答案

类似问题

A stock has a beta of 1.56 and an expected return of 17.3 percent. A risk-free asset currently earns 5.1 percent. If a portfolio of the two assets has a beta of 1.06, what are the portfolio weights?

Part 2 of 4 The portfolio weights for each stock are: Stock A: [ Select ] -25% -50% 25% 100% 50% Stock W: [ Select ] -100% 100% -50% -25% 50% 25% Stock Z: [ Select ] -25% 50% 100% -50% -100% 25%

Part 2 of 4 The portfolio weights for each stock are: Stock A: [ Select ] Stock W: [ Select ] Stock Z: [ Select ]

Part 2 of 4 The portfolio weights for each stock are: Stock A: [ Select ] 50% -50% 25% 100% -25% Stock W: [ Select ] 50% 25% -25% 100% -100% -50% Stock Z: [ Select ] -25% -100% 50% -50% 25% 100%

Part 2 of 4: An investor allocates $20,000 into Stock A and shorts $10,000 of Stock B. What is the portfolio weight of Stock B? Round your answer to four decimals. DO NOT use percentage format. E.g. 10.51% should be entered as 0.1051

Part 2 of 4 The portfolio weights for each stock are: Stock A: [ Select ] -25% -50% 100% 25% 50% Stock W: [ Select ] -25% -100% 25% -50% 100% 50% Stock Z: [ Select ] -25% -50% 100% 50% -100% 25%

Suppose you manage a small fund of $100 million fully invested in small stocks. Assume the riskfree rate is zero. Assume further that you find only 60 such stocks worthy of investing. If the second stock has a weight of w2 = −0.02, how much money will you put into it? (in millions)

更多留学生实用工具

考试浏览器助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单