Which of the following best describes a challenge in cross-ideological dialogue that Mounk and Guzmán name?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

To approach this question, we begin by considering the core idea attributed to Mounk and Guzmán about cross-ideological dialogue, which centers on trust and the perception of motives in differing viewpoints.
Option 1: 'People often assume those with different views are acting in bad faith.' This aligns with their discussion of a challenge in dialogue across ideologies, where interlocutors frequently suspect ill intent rather than engaging charitably.
Option 2: 'The only way to talk across divides is to avoid controversial topics.' While some strategies suggest steering away from inflammatory issues, Mounk and Guzmán emphasize more about underlying trust and presumptions rather than prescribing avoidance as the sole method.
Option 3: 'Most people refuse to engage in any disagreement at all.' This overstates a general behavior; the authors describe a barrier or tendency in dialogue, not a universal or absolute refusal to disagree.
Option 4: 'It is impossible to build trust once differences are known.' This claim is too strong and contradicts the idea of finding ways to navigate disagreements; the authors discuss challenges but do not assert impossibility of building trust once differences are acknowledged.

In summary, option 1 correctly captures the identified challenge—the assumption of bad faith when views differ—while the other options either misstate the central issue, overgeneralize, or offer an overly drastic conclusion that does not reflect the nuance of cross-ideological dialogue presented by Mounk and Guzmán.

Community Citizenship Initiative 2025 (Graduate Students - Morningside) Quiz: How to Have Difficult Conversations

Which of the following best describes a challenge in cross-ideological dialogue that Mounk and Guzmán name?

查看解析

登录即可查看完整答案

类似问题

Why do polarized societies create structural openings for authoritarian leaders?

Affective polarization refers to

Dassonneville and Çakır's (2021) conclusion about polarization and turnout is that when polarization increases, centrist voters will be [ Select ] demobilized mobilized , while extreme voters will be [ Select ] demobilized mobilized by parties with extreme positions.

Dassonneville and Çakır (2021) find a [choice] relationship between levels of polarization and the extent to which electorates are partisan. (hint: read p. 15)

The redistricting explanation argues that constituencies are increasingly becoming politically [ Select ] homogeneous heterogeneous . The sorting argument thinks that they are increaingly becoming politically [ Select ] homogeneous heterogeneous .

Political parties play a role in increasing polarization through:

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

Economic stress and unpredictable times have resulted in a booming industry for self-help products

更多留学生实用工具

考试浏览器助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单