Political parties play a role in increasing polarization through:

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Exploring how political parties influence polarization, we can evaluate each option in turn.
Option 1: 'Managing political campaigns.' Campaign strategies often emphasize divisive messaging, issue framing, and aggressive rhetoric to mobilize supporters, which can deepen ideological separation between groups. This can contribute to polarization by making partisan distinctions more salient.
Option 2: 'Mobilizing voter turnout.' Efforts to maximize turnout frequently involve mobilizing base supporters and emphasizing partisan identities. When campaigns frame choices as stark contrasts between opposing camps, turnout efforts can amplify perceived conflict and entrench polarized views among followers.
Option 3: 'Steering redistricting processes.' Redistricting can create or reinforce safe, homogeneous districts through gerrymandering, reducing cross-cutting competition and encouraging party coalitions to lock in positions. This structural change can heighten polarization by limiting moderating cross-pressures and encouraging stricter party-line voting.
Option 4: 'All of the above.' Since the first three options each describe mechanisms by which parties can increase polarization, combining them under this choice reflects a comprehensive account of how parties influence polarization through multiple channels.
Option 5: 'None of the above.' This would claim that none of these mechanisms contribute to polarization, which contradicts the observed effects of campaign strategies, turnout dynamics, and redistricting on ideological divides.
In light of these distinctions, the reasoning for each option emphasizes how campaign practices, mobilization tactics, and structural districting can interact to deepen partisan distinctions, while the last option grouping all three as contributing highlights the cumulative impact across mechanisms.

SP25-BL-SPEA-V181-8513 Exam 2

Political parties play a role in increasing polarization through:

查看解析

登录即可查看完整答案

类似问题

Which of the following best describes a challenge in cross-ideological dialogue that Mounk and Guzmán name?

Why do polarized societies create structural openings for authoritarian leaders?

Affective polarization refers to

Dassonneville and Çakır's (2021) conclusion about polarization and turnout is that when polarization increases, centrist voters will be [ Select ] demobilized mobilized , while extreme voters will be [ Select ] demobilized mobilized by parties with extreme positions.

Dassonneville and Çakır (2021) find a [choice] relationship between levels of polarization and the extent to which electorates are partisan. (hint: read p. 15)

The redistricting explanation argues that constituencies are increasingly becoming politically [ Select ] homogeneous heterogeneous . The sorting argument thinks that they are increaingly becoming politically [ Select ] homogeneous heterogeneous .

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

Economic stress and unpredictable times have resulted in a booming industry for self-help products

更多留学生实用工具

考试浏览器助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单