For which of the following planetary boundaries have no quantitative indicators been presented yet?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The question asks which planetary boundary lacks presented quantitative indicators at this time. 
Option a: Climate change. This boundary has well-established quantitative indicators such as global mean surface temperature, atmospheric CO2 concentration, and radiative forcing, making it clearly indicator-supported.
Option b: Ocean acidification. This boundary is tracked with quantitative metrics like the mean ocean pH and carbonate ion concentration, so it has established indicators.
Option c: Chemicalisation of the environment. In the literature on planetary boundaries, this domain has been discussed as a problematic area where the development of clear, agreed-upon quantitative indicators has lagged, and there isn’t a widely accepted set of numeric thresholds yet. That’s why this option is identified as lacking presented quantitative indicators.
Option d: Changes in land use. This boundary uses quantitative indicators such as rate of deforestation, urbanization rate, and total cropland area to monitor change, giving it established metrics.
So, among the choices, the one that has no widely presented quantitative indicators yet is chemicalisation of the environment, whereas the others have concrete, trackable metrics supporting their boundary assessments.

For which of the following planetary boundaries have no quantitative indicators been presented yet?

查看解析

登录即可查看完整答案

类似问题

According to the Stockholm Resilience Centre, how many of the nine planetary boundaries have already been crossed as a result of human activity?

According to the Stockholm Resilience Centre, how many of the nine planetary boundaries have already been crossed as a result of human activity?

The term planetary boundaries was explained in Rockstrom et al (2009) as...

For which of the following planetary boundaries has the threshold of acceptable risk been transgressed?