True theories are stumbled upon by luck.

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The statement presented asks whether 'True theories are stumbled upon by luck.'
Option 1: 'False'. An explanation supporting this choice would note that theories considered true or robust typically arise from systematic inquiry, careful observation, methodological analysis, and repeated validation—not mere chance. Critical reasoning, testing hypotheses, and accumulation of evidence contribute to theories gaining credibility over time, rather than luck alone.
Option 2: 'True'. If one argues this, they would imply that theoretical breakthroughs occur by accident without a deliberate, structured process. This view ignores the role of hypothesis formation, experimentation, peer review, replication, and refinement that are central to establishing a theory as true or well-supported. It also overlooks the cumulative and incremental nature of scientific progress, where random luck alone is seldom sufficient to produce durable, widely-accepted theories.
In evaluating these options, consider how scientific theories gain acceptance: through coherent explanations, predictive power, and reproducible results, which point away from luck as the primary mechanism and toward systematic inquiry. The contrast between the two choices highlights why luck alone cannot account for the development and verification of true theories.

BIOLOGY 109 001 WN 2025 Quiz 2

True theories are stumbled upon by luck.

查看解析

登录即可查看完整答案

类似问题

Pluralism is a view about the relationship among sciences which holds that (Check BOTH that apply)

I this week's 1919 reading, the author argues that there are some questions for which science does not have answers. Which of the following questions ARE answerable by science, based on what the author argues in this text? There may be more than one suitable answer.

Based on video 1.2, which statement(s) reflect why we need to approach the demarcation question as a family resemblance set of indicators? Select as many as apply.

It is argued that generalised one-size-fits-all models of how science works seemed doomed to failure. What supports this argument? Select as many as apply.

refers to the (sometimes contested) notion that science is simply a matter of getting more and better facts, and that all genuine knowledge is either true by definition.

Is science the correct tool to use to answer or attempt to find an answer to the question below? Write yes or no. And tell me why science IS OR IN NOT the right tool for answering the question. Do ghosts exist? Yes or no [Fill in the blank], and why [Fill in the blank], ?

This dead robin on the table has 1000 parts per million DDT in its fatty tissue.

A theory is said to be strong if it is easy to prove it is right if it is right.

更多留学生实用工具

考试浏览器助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单