If you found a foodservice similar to yours in size, menu, and location, which of the following could you benchmark?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

We start by understanding the scenario: you have a foodservice operation and you’re looking to benchmark against a peer that is similar in size, menu, and location. Now we examine each option to see what kinds of metrics can be benchmarked in this context.
Option 1: Sales. Benchmarking sales makes sense because you can compare revenue performance, sales growth, and revenue per seat or per available customer against a peer with similar scale and market conditions. This helps identify whether your top-line performance aligns with comparable operators.
Option 2: All of these. This choice suggests that every listed metric is suitable to benchmark. If each individual metric is meaningful to compare with a comparable business, then this option could be reasonable, assuming you have confidence in the comparability and data quality for all items.
Option 3: Prime cost percentage. Prime cost (typically direct labor plus cost of goods sold as a percentage of sales) is a core operational metric in hospitality. Benchmarking it helps assess efficiency in staffing and purchasing relative to sales, which is particularly relevant when peers share similar menus and service levels.
Option 4: Food cost percentage. Food cost percentage is a standard metric for foodservice performance, reflecting how well a kitchen manages waste, portion control, supplier pricing, and menu engineering. It is commonly benchmarked against comparable operations.
Option 5: Employee turnover rate. Turnover can significantly impact labor costs, training needs, and service quality. Benchmarking turnover against similar venues reveals workforce stability and potential human resource efficiency issues.
Each of the individual options contains a plausible benchmarking target for a peer with similar size, menu, and location. The core idea in benchmarking is to compare performance using metrics that are controllable and relevant to your business model. When all of these metrics are applicable and you have reliable data, the combined idea of benchmarking across all of them becomes feasible.
In practice, if you possess data for sales, prime cost percentage, food cost percentage, and employee turnover for both your operation and your peer, you could benchmark each metric separately and then synthesize insights. The presence of multiple valid benchmarking targets reinforces why an option proposing multiple targets could be correct in a multiple-choice context.

11:709:448:01 FOOD PROD MGMT FINAL Exam - F25- Dec 18- Requires Respondus LockDown Browser

If you found a foodservice similar to yours in size, menu, and location, which of the following could you benchmark?

查看解析

登录即可查看完整答案

类似问题

What are measurements that evaluate results to determine whether a project is meeting its goals?

Combining two or metrics into a single indicator is a(n) . A(n) involves a calculation, while a(n) __ requires no calculations and has simple dimensions.

Which of these benchmarking metrics is not suitable for a support process?

Metrics can be defined as determining what will be measured and how this will be measured.

KPI stands for:

更多留学生实用工具

考试浏览器助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单

11:709:448:01 FOOD PROD MGMT FINAL Exam - F25- Dec 18- Requires Respondus LockDown Browser

If you found a foodservice similar to yours in size, menu, and location, which of the following could you benchmark?

查看解析

登录即可查看完整答案

类似问题

What are measurements that evaluate results to determine whether a project is meeting its goals?

Combining two or metrics into a single indicator is a(n) ______. A(n) ______ involves a calculation, while a(n) ______ requires no calculations and has simple dimensions.

Which of these benchmarking metrics is not suitable for a support process?

Metrics can be defined as determining what will be measured and how this will be measured.

KPI stands for:

更多留学生实用工具

考试浏览器助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单

Combining two or metrics into a single indicator is a(n) . A(n) involves a calculation, while a(n) __ requires no calculations and has simple dimensions.