What is the primary reason to use DNF over rpm for installing packages?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

We begin by restating what’s given and noting any gaps in the provided choices.
The question asks: What is the primary reason to use DNF over rpm for installing packages?
From the data, the only explicit option provided is:
- d. Dependency resolution and repository management
However, the list of all answer options is missing in the input, so we cannot evaluate other potential choices.
Now, evaluating the concept itself:
Option d suggests that the core justification for using DNF instead of rpm is dependency resolution and repository management. This aligns with the fundamental role of DNF as a high-level package manager that can automatically resolve package dependencies, fetch required packages from configured repositories, and manage metadata. This contrasts with rpm, which is a lower-level package tool that primarily installs, removes, or queries individual RPMs and does not automatically resolve dependencies or manage repositories.
Explaining why this is correct in context:
- Dependency resolution: DNF analyzes the dependencies of the target package and ensures that all required packages are installed or updated to satisfy those dependencies, often pulling different packages or versions to satisfy constraints. This reduces breakages and manual dependency hunting.
- Repository management: DNF interacts with software repositories to locate, download, and verify packages, and it can handle metadata caching, enabling smoother upgrades and consistency across installations.
- Transactional installs: DNF performs operations as a transaction where possible, allowing rollback if something goes wrong, which rpm does not guarantee at the same level since it operates more granularly on individual packages.
Now, considering the typical incorrect options that might appear in a multiple-choice set, which are not shown here:
- A choice focusing on only “installation speed” would be incomplete, since speed is not the primary differentiator; dependency handling and repository access are the defining differences.
- A choice claiming rpm alone manages all dependencies would be incorrect, as rpm requires manual dependency resolution or external tools to handle them.
- A choice about GUI or user experience, while potentially relevant to usability, does not capture the core technical reason for preferring DNF over rpm in package management.
- A choice asserting that DNF is only for newer or specific distributions would be inaccurate; DNF is used broadly as a front-end to rpm-based distributions and is designed for dependency resolution and repository management across these systems.
In summary, the stated option d captures the essential rationale: DNF provides automated dependency resolution and repository management, which rpm lacks at the same level, making DNF the preferred tool for installing packages in most cases.

CET-1025 - 50975 - Linux System Administration - 202505 - 001

What is the primary reason to use DNF over rpm for installing packages?

查看解析

登录即可查看完整答案

类似问题

What happens when you run dnf update with no arguments?

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

Economic stress and unpredictable times have resulted in a booming industry for self-help products

People born without creativity never can develop it

A product has a selling price of $20, a contribution margin ratio of 40% and fixed cost of $120,000. To make a profit of $30,000. The number of units that must be sold is: Type the number without $ and a comma. Eg: 20000

Which of the following statement regarding cost is correct:

Under the assumptions used in cost-volume-profit analysis, as the activity increases:

The CVP and break-even analysis are supported by a range of important assumptions. Which of the following is not an assumption of the CVP:

更多留学生实用工具

考试浏览器助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单