In 1952, chemists Harold Urey and Stanley Miller mixed ammonia, methane, and hydrogen in a closed container, zapped it with electrical sparks, and found that

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Question recap: In 1952, chemists Harold Urey and Stanley Miller mixed ammonia, methane, and hydrogen in a closed container, zapped it with electrical sparks, and found that

Option 1: they could induce cold fusion. This is incorrect because cold fusion refers to a controversial and unproven process of producing fusion energy at room temperature, which has nothing to do with forming organic molecules from simple gases under electrical sparks. The Miller–Urey setup was not about fusion physics, so this choice misrepresents the experiment’s purpose and outcome.

Option 2: they had created life in a test tube. This is a common misconception. While the experiment simulated early Earth conditions and produced organic compounds, it did not generate living organisms. Life requires complex replication and metabolism beyond simple amino acid formation, so declaring life creation is inaccurate.

Option 3: amino acids had been created. This statement aligns with the historical result of the Miller–Urey experiment: under electric stimulation, the mixture yielded amino acids, which are the building blocks of proteins and essential to biochemistry. The formation of amino acids demonstrates abiotic synthesis of organic molecules from simple gases.

Option 4: amino acids cannot form this way. This is incorrect because the experiment explicitly demonstrated that amino acids can form under energy input (sparks) from a mixture of hydrogen, methane, and ammonia, supporting abiotic synthesis pathways for organic molecules.

Option 5: single-celled microorganisms had been spontaneously created. This is false for similar reasons to Option 2: no life, cells, or microorganisms arose in the apparatus; only simple organic molecules like amino acids were produced, not cells or organisms.

In summary, the only option that accurately reflects the outcome of the Miller–Urey experiment is that amino acids had been created, while all other statements misrepresent the experiment’s results or the nature of abiotic synthesis.

EESC1120.01|.02 Summer 2025 Our Home Amongst the Cosmos [Kruckenberg] Week 6 Quiz

In 1952, chemists Harold Urey and Stanley Miller mixed ammonia, methane, and hydrogen in a closed container, zapped it with electrical sparks, and found that

查看解析

登录即可查看完整答案

类似问题

Chemical evolution required about _____ years to form the first primitive biological self replicating cells.

CHOOSE THE BEST ANSWER Which of the following statements would support the abiogenesis hypothesis for the origin of life on Earth?

CHOOSE THE BEST ANSWER With regard to the origin of life on Earth, which of the following findings would support the hypothesis of abiogenesis, but not the panspermia hypothesis?

Question at position 33 A Martian probe brings back a soil sample that contains stretches of DNA that are similar to life on Earth. This evidence would support which hypothesis? Panspermia"RNA world"AbiogenesisNot enough informationClear my selection

Question at position 22 Of the approaches listed below, which one is used to study the origin of life on Earth?PhylogeneticsComputer modelingComparative anatomyFossil analysisMolecular clocksClear my selection

Question at position 16 What surface is thought to have served as a site where nucleotides could be held together in close proximity?clayglasssandrockwaterClear my selection

Question at position 17 Which is thought to be the original energy source for the metabolism of the first living cells?PhotosynthesisGeothermal heatSolar energyLightningFireClear my selection

更多留学生实用工具

考试浏览器助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单