Question at position 11 Henry, a five-year-old boy, knows that when he goes out with his mother and throws a tantrum, he will not get a treat. However, when he goes out with his father and throws a tantrum, he will get a treat. Henry's learning in this scenario exemplifies generalization in operant conditioning. extinction in classical conditioning. renewal in classical conditioning. discrimination in operant conditioning.

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

To analyze Henry's behavior, we need to look at how the outcome (treat or no treat) changes with the context (mother vs father).
Option 1: 'generalization in operant conditioning.' Generalization would mean Henry responds in the same way to multiple similar situations because the cues are not sufficiently discriminated. In this scenario, the presence of mom versus dad serves as a clear discriminative cue that signals different consequences for the tantrum. Since Henry treats the two contexts differently, this is not generalization.
Option 2: 'extinction in classical conditioning.' Extinction in classical conditioning involves the gradual weakening of a conditioned response when the conditioned stimulus is no longer paired with the unconditioned stimulus. The scenario involves operant conditioning (consequences following a behavior) and does not describe the fading of a conditioned response to a learned stimulus over time, so extinction in classical conditioning does not fit.
Option 3: 'renewal in classical conditioning.' Renewal refers to a recovery of a conditioned response when the context changes after extinction, typically in classical conditioning. Here, there is no process described where a learned response was extinguished and then reappeared due to a context change; rather, the focus is on differential outcomes depending on who is present. Therefore, renewal is not an appropriate label.
Option 4: 'discrimination in operant conditioning.' This option captures the core idea: Henry learns to respond differently to the same behavior (throwing a tantrum) depending on who is present. With his mother, a tantrum yields no treat, while with his father, a tantrum yields a treat. This demonstrates discriminative control, where a specific antecedent (the person present) signals which consequence will follow the behavior, aligning with discrimination in operant conditioning.
Collectively, the scenario demonstrates that Henry uses contextual cues (mother vs father) to discriminate the consequences of his tantrum behavior, rather than generalizing across contexts, undergoing extinction, or exhibiting renewal in a classical conditioning framework.

查看解析

登录即可查看完整答案

类似问题

Question at position 67 In the context of operant conditioning, ________ refers to rewarding successive approximations of a desired behavior. acquisitionhabituationshapingmodeling

Question at position 55 In the context of operant conditioning, a reinforcer that is innately satisfying and does not require any learning on the organism's part to make it pleasurable is referred to as a ________ reinforcer.primarysecondary tertiarynegative

Daniel is trying to use the principles of operant conditioning to teach his daughter to stop biting people. He takes away one of her favorite toys when she bites someone. What strategy is Daniel using with his daughter?

Question at position 13 Jill puts up an umbrella toescape the rain. She begins usingan umbrella every time it rains. Question Blank 1 of 1[input]

Question at position 10 Maria sells only half of herquota for November, so her bosstakes away the radio she keeps ather desk. Her pattern ofunderperforming at work ends asa result Question Blank 1 of 1[input]

Question at position 9 Troy puts on his seatbelt to getthe loud buzzing noise that his carmakes to stop. He begins wearinghis seatbelt more frequently in thefuture. Question Blank 1 of 1[input]

更多留学生实用工具

考试浏览器助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单