Competition is fierce in network-effects markets because the winner often obtains a monopoly on the market.

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The question presents a true/false statement about network-effects markets: 'Competition is fierce in network-effects markets because the winner often obtains a monopoly on the market.'

Option 1: True
- In many network-effects markets, a critical mass of users creates a positive feedback loop: the more users a platform has, the more valuable it becomes to each user, which attracts even more users. This can lead to a dominant player accumulating a large share and creating significant barriers to entry for rivals.
- The lock-in effect, switching costs, and high incumbent switching barriers amplify this dynamic, making it harder for new entrants to gain traction, which can resemble monopoly power or a winner-takes-most market structure.
- As a result, competition can be intense during the early stages, but the eventual equilibrium often tilts toward one firm capturing a monopoly or near-monopoly status, with other firms facing steep uphill battles to dislodge the leader.

Option 2: False
- It is possible for multiple firms to compete effectively in some network-effect markets, especially when niches, interoperability, or open standards mitigate monopolistic outcomes.
- Some markets experience sustained multi-homing (users participating in several networks) or regulatory interventions that prevent a single firm from monopolizing the market, which contradicts the notion that a monopoly is the usual or inevitable outcome.
- Therefore, stating that competition is necessarily fierce because the winner often obtains a monopoly overlooks cases where dominant players do not fully monopolize or where competitive dynamics remain vibrant even with network effects.

Option 3 (alternative consideration, though not required here): The strength of competition in network-effect markets can be path-dependent and context-specific, depending on factors like the rate of user growth, platform openness, and competitive responses. If user growth slows or incumbents face regulatory or technical challenges, the anticipated monopolistic outcome may be incomplete or delayed.

Option 4: Implicit nuance to avoid overgeneralization
- While network effects can enable winner-takes-most outcomes, this is not an ironclad rule across all industries. Some markets exhibit strong competition despite network effects due to alternative standards, modular architectures, or user preferences that value diversity and interoperability.

Overall, the statement emphasizes a common and influential pattern in network-effects markets—strong incumbents can emerge because of network-driven advantages—while also acknowledging that this outcome is not universal. The reasoning above explains why the statement can be considered true in many cases, while also outlining conditions under which it may not hold.

MIS 446, Section 001: It Bus Strat (22511--UP---P-MIS-----446-------001-) MIS446Q2

Competition is fierce in network-effects markets because the winner often obtains a monopoly on the market.

查看解析

登录即可查看完整答案

类似问题

Due to network effects, as the price of a service (or product) is reduced, which of the following is false?

Which of the following is true about network effects?

Which of the following is false about the economy under a network effect?

Direct network effects mean:

What does 'user valuation' mean in platform economics?

In the real-world example, many TikTok users are against the government’s move toward banning TikTok, because they have already built a community there. Which of the following best characterizes the aspect of TikTok illustrated in this example?

Which of the following statements about network economics is not true?

更多留学生实用工具

考试浏览器助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单