Based on the author's discussion, the issue of "network effects" in Bitcoin:

1. Pertains to the Bitcoin network's capacity for processing transactions.
2. Relates to the challenge posed by similar, competing networks.
3. Involves the topic of how decentralized the network is.
4. Deals with the issue of preventing the same funds from being spent twice.
5. Addresses the consideration of minimizing risk when determining the optimal moment to invest in Bitcoin.
6. Touches upon the matter of how energy-efficient the network operates.

The correct answer is:
A. All of the below.
B. 1 & 3.
C. 2 & 5.
D. 4 & 6.
E. 1 & 2.

Question

Based on the author's discussion, the issue of "network effects" in Bitcoin:

1. Pertains to the Bitcoin network's capacity for processing transactions.
2. Relates to the challenge posed by similar, competing networks.
3. Involves the topic of how decentralized the network is.
4. Deals with the issue of preventing the same funds from being spent twice.
5. Addresses the consideration of minimizing risk when determining the optimal moment to invest in Bitcoin.
6. Touches upon the matter of how energy-efficient the network operates.

The correct answer is:
A. All of the below.
B. 1 & 3.
C. 2 & 5. 
D. 4 & 6.
E. 1 & 2.

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Reiterating the question in plain terms: the prompt asks which items among 1–6 reflect the author's discussion of the issue of 'network effects' in Bitcoin, and it frames possible composite answers labeled A through E.
Option A: All of the below. This would be correct only if every single statement 1 through 6 is actually described as part of the network effects discussion by the author. If even one item is not included in that discussion, this option becomes incorrect. We need to verify each statement against the author’s framing before accepting this blanket claim.
Option B: 1 & 3. This pairing asserts that network effects pertain to transaction throughput (1) and to the decentralization aspect (3). If the author does not connect either of these two items specifically to network effects, or if one of them is not part of the network-effects discussion, this pairing fails. We must assess whether throughput and decentralization are both identified as network effects together.
Option C: 2 & 5. Here the claim is that network effects relate to the challenge posed by similar, competing networks (2) and to minimizing risk when determining the optimal investment timing (5). We need to determine if the author explicitly ties network effects to competitive networks and to investment-risk considerations, and whether both are part of the same network-effects discussion.
Option D: 4 & 6. This option pairs preventing double-spending (4) with energy efficiency (6). If the author does not discuss these aspects under the umbrella of network effects, or treats them as separate from network effects, this pairing would be misaligned with the intended framing.
Option E: 1 & 2. This pairing pairs transaction throughput (1) with competition from other networks (2). If the author attributes network effects to either throughput or competitive pressure but not both, or if one belongs to a different conceptual cluster, this option could be incomplete.
Now, analyzing each option in turn:
- Option A (All of the below): The strength of this choice hinges on whether every item 1–6 is indeed described as part of the network-effects discussion. If the author includes all six items as facets of network effects, A would be supported; otherwise, it overstates the scope. The potential overreach here is common if any single item is tangential or outside network-effects discourse.
- Option B (1 & 3): If the author explicitly ties network effects to throughput (1) and to how decentralized the network is (3), this pairing would be coherent. However, if the conversation emphasizes other facets as primary drivers of network effects (for example, competition, investment timing, or energy efficiency), then B would mischaracterize the scope.
- Option C (2 & 5): This pairing asserts network effects are about competing networks (2) and about risk-conscious investment timing (5). If the author frames network effects as phenomena that arise from user adoption, externalities, and the size of the network—often leading to competitive advantages and market dynamics—then 2 could be a fit. Pairing that with 5—risk minimization in deciding when to invest—requires the author to link network growth and investor behavior as intertwined through network effects. If both connections are explicitly discussed, this option is solid; if one or both are not framed as network effects, it would be incorrect.
- Option D (4 & 6): The pair of double-spending prevention (4) and energy efficiency (6) would need to be presented by the author as manifestations or consequences of network effects. If the discussion treats these as technical or security-related concerns rather than social/market network effects, this option may misalign with the intended category.
- Option E (1 & 2): Choosing throughput (1) and competition from similar networks (2) suggests network effects arise from scalability and the presence of competing platforms. If the author links network effects to both capacity and competitive landscape, this could be accurate; if the discussion instead places network effects primarily on adoption-based externalities rather than competitive pressure, then E would be only partially correct.
Pulling these threads together, the author’s framing determines which pairing best captures network effects. The core insight behind network effects often centers on how the value or impact of a network grows with more users and with the presence of competing or alternative networks, which tends to manifest in discussions about competition (2) and strategic considerations like investment timing under risk (5). Therefore, the combination of 2 and 5 aligns with a typical network-effects perspective, explaining how competing networks influence a platform’s value and how investor timing relates to the evolving ecosystem. If the author indeed treats both 2 and 5 as components of network effects, option C would be the coherent choice. If, instead, the author emphasizes throughput, decentralization, security, or energy considerations as the main network-effects angles, then another option might be foregrounded.
In summary, the reasoning hinges on whether the author explicitly ties network effects to the presence of competing networks (2) and to risk-aware investment timing (5). If both connections are established in the discussion, the option pairing 2 & 5 (i.e., option C) correctly captures the network-effects scope as presented. If any of those items is not part of the network-effects framing, the corresponding option would be incorrect due to excluding other valid components.

APS1050H F LEC0101 Broken Money Quiz

查看解析

登录即可查看完整答案

类似问题

Question at position 7 Which law describes how network value increases as the number of users grows?Nielsen’s LawKryder’s LawMoore’s LawMetcalfe’s Law

Identify the bond angle and molecular shape of H2O.

Using Dalton's Atomic theory, explain the following observation. Hint: DO NOT answer with a law! The mass of the products at the end of the reaction was the same as the mass of the reactants at the beginning.

The number of valence electrons in a sulfur atom is 16.

If matter is uniform throughout and can be separated into multiple substances by physical means, it is called a(n) ________________.

Circle the letter for all examples of chemical change. Circle all correct answers.

Which of the following Lewis structures are incorrect? There may be more than one.

For 18O2-, identify each of the followingMass Number

更多留学生实用工具

考试浏览器助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单