Coupling effect means that

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The question asks about the coupling effect in testing and fault models. 
Option 1: 'programs are always coupled with bugs such that you can't write programs without bugs for large enough programs.' This overstates a general truth about software quality. While larger programs tend to have more bugs, the claim that you can't write bug-free programs for large enough systems is not a precise description of the coupling concept and ignores the idea of how faults may be related across a test suite.
Option 2: 'coverage is always coupled with mutants.' This confuses two distinct testing ideas. Code coverage relates to how much of the program is exercised by tests, while mutation testing (mutants) concerns the effectiveness of tests against deliberately injected faults. The coupling concept does not state that coverage and mutants are inherently bound to each other in the general sense.
Option 3: 'simple faults are coupled with complex faults such that finding simple faults implies that the same test suite will be able to detect coupled complex faults.' This aligns with the intuition behind coupling: detecting a simple fault can indicate a test suite is capable of catching related, more complex faults that are linked or correlated, suggesting that simple faults serve as indicators for a broader fault landscape and guiding test design accordingly.
In summary, the first option paints an absolute and often inaccurate picture about bugs in large programs, the second option mismatches two concepts (coverage and mutation testing) that are not inherently coupled in the stated sense, while the third option captures the essence of coupling between simple and complex faults as it relates to test effectiveness and related fault families.

SOFT3202 COMP9202 (ND) Quiz 6

Coupling effect means that

查看解析

登录即可查看完整答案

类似问题

In mutation testing, what does it mean for mutant A to subsume mutant B? (see https://edstem.org/au/courses/20753/lessons/79799/slides/539235)

This question has been re-marked. Mutation analysis

Your tool changes the arithmetic operator in x = a + b to x = a - b. The mutant is then evaluated using your test suite. Why does mutation testing apply this kind of change?

Which one of the following statements about mutant subsumption is correct?

Equivalent mutants

Competent programmer hypothesis is another name for

What is the difference between traditional fault seeding and mutation analysis?

Mutation analysis

更多留学生实用工具

考试浏览器助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单