In a mediation analysis, after establishing that the pairwise correlations are significant among the independent variable (X), the mediator (M) and the dependent variable (Y), what must occur in the final step to demonstrate that M is a significant full mediator of the relationship between X and Y?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

In mediation analysis, after establishing significant correlations among X, M, and Y, the key test for mediation quality lies in the behavior of the direct effect when the mediator is included in the model.
Option 1: 'The total effect of X on Y is greater than the direct effect.' While you may observe that the total effect can be larger than the direct effect due to the indirect pathway through M, this alone does not demonstrate full mediation; the distinction between total and direct effects is informative but not the definitive criterion for full mediation.
Option 2: 'All relationships tested in the last step remain significant.' This statement would indicate that the relationships persist even after including M, suggesting partial mediation at best. Full mediation requires the direct path to lose significance, not merely remain significant.
Option 3: 'The correlation between X and M is larger than between X and Y.' The relative magnitudes of the correlations tell us about associations but do not establish the mediating mechanism. A larger X-M correlation does not by itself prove that M transmits the effect from X to Y.
Option 4: 'The direct effect of X on Y becomes nonsignificant when M is included in the model.' This criterion is the classic definition of full (complete) mediation: once M accounts for the pathway, X no longer has a direct influence on Y independent of M. It reflects the idea that the effect of X on Y operates entirely through M, satisfying the standard test for full mediation.

To summarize, the crucial diagnostic for full mediation is the disappearance (becoming nonsignificant) of the direct X→Y path after introducing the mediator M, rather than reliance on broader comparisons of effect sizes, persistence of significance in all paths, or simple differences in X–M versus X–Y correlations. Each of the other statements either describes a different scenario (partial mediation) or misstates what the data imply about the mediating process.

PSYC-312-02 Midterm 3- Requires Respondus LockDown Browser

In a mediation analysis, after establishing that the pairwise correlations are significant among the independent variable (X), the mediator (M) and the dependent variable (Y), what must occur in the final step to demonstrate that M is a significant full mediator of the relationship between X and Y?

查看解析

登录即可查看完整答案

类似问题

What conclusion can be drawn about the block "school and neighborhood influences"

What would have to happen for statistical analyses to support partial or full mediation? First poverty, mediators and outcome must show significant relationship pairwise. Then,

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

Economic stress and unpredictable times have resulted in a booming industry for self-help products

People born without creativity never can develop it

A product has a selling price of $20, a contribution margin ratio of 40% and fixed cost of $120,000. To make a profit of $30,000. The number of units that must be sold is: Type the number without $ and a comma. Eg: 20000

Which of the following statement regarding cost is correct:

Under the assumptions used in cost-volume-profit analysis, as the activity increases:

更多留学生实用工具

考试浏览器助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单