Question at position 9 Rather than using a stopwatch, suppose you measured the pendulum's period 10 times using a metronome. Your measurements are as follows: {3 s, 3 s, 3 s, 3 s, 3s, 3 s, 3 s, 3 s, 3 s, 3s}. The mean measurement is 3 s. In your lab notebook, how should you report the uncertainty in your mean measurement? 0 s1 s0.75 s3s1.3s0.7 s0.5 sClear my selection

Question

Question at position 9  Rather than using a stopwatch, suppose you measured the pendulum's period 10 times using a metronome. Your measurements are as follows: {3 s, 3 s, 3 s, 3 s, 3s, 3 s, 3 s, 3 s, 3 s, 3s}. The mean measurement is 3 s. In your lab notebook, how should you report the uncertainty in your mean measurement? 0 s1 s0.75 s3s1.3s0.7 s0.5 sClear my selection

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Starting with the core idea: the uncertainty in the mean is derived from the spread of your measurements, not just the value of the mean itself.
Option 1: 0 s. Since every one of the ten measurements is exactly 3 s, the data show no spread at all. The standard deviation of identical values is 0, and the standard error of the mean (SEM = s/√n) would also be 0. Therefore, reporting the uncertainty as 0 s reflects your data precisely.
Option 2: 1 s. This would imply substantial spread among the measurements, which is contradicted by the identical values reported. There is no basis for a 1 s uncertainty here.
Option 3: 0.75 s. This is another way of expressing a nonzero spread, but with perfectly identical measurements the computed uncertainty should be zero; 0.75 s would overstate the precision implied by the data.
Option 4: 3 s. Presenting the mean as 3 s with a 3 s uncertainty would indicate a huge uncertainty equal to the mean itself, which does not align with the observed data where all trials matched exactly.
Option 5: 1.3 s. Similar to 1 s or 0.75 s, it suggests notable scatter in the measurements, which is not present here.
Option 6: 0.7 s. This is a small, nonzero uncertainty, incompatible with the fact that all ten measurements are identical; the sample has zero spread, so the SEM cannot be nonzero.
Option 7: 0.5 s. Again, nonzero and not supported by the data, since there is no variation to justify any uncertainty.
In summary, since every measurement equals 3 s, the spread is zero, leading to an uncertainty of 0 s for the mean. The other options imply some spread or instrument limitations that are not reflected by the given data.

查看解析

登录即可查看完整答案

类似问题

A student measures the density of a liquid five times and gets the results (all in gram/cm3 ) 1.8, 2.0, 2.0, 1.9, and 1.8. What would you suggest as the best estimate and uncertainty based on these measurements?

Each of the two research groups discovers a new elementary particle. The two reported masses are: m1 = (7.8 ± 0.1) × 10-27 kg m2 = (7.0 ± 0.2) × 10-27 kg What is the discrepancy between the two measurements? Based on the reported masses, would you say they are likely to be the same particle?

Two students measured the length of the same rod and reported the results 135 ± 3 mm and 137 ± 3 mm. What is the discrepancy between the two measurements, and is it significant?

Rewrite the following result in its clearest forms (Best Estimate ± Uncertainty) and scientific notation, with suitable numbers of significant figures in the uncertainty and decimal places in the best estimate: 𝑣 = ( 238965 ± 47 ) 𝑚 / 𝑠 =

What is the uncertainty [Fill in the blank], °C indicated by this thermometer? (Only add the numerical value here, do not add +/- or the units) Hint: only 1 sig fig can be used for uncertainty unless the first sig fig starts with a 1. Open this image in a new tab if your image does not load

What is the uncertainty for this measurement [Fill in the blank], cm. The numbers shown on the tape are in cm. (Only add the numerical value here, do not add +/- or the units) Open this image in a new tab if your image does not load

更多留学生实用工具

考试浏览器助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单