Question at position 23 ad hominemstrawmanhasty generalizationred herringappeal to emotion

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Question presented: 'Question at position 23 ad hominemstrawmanhasty generalizationred herringappeal to emotion' with answer options: 
- ad hominem
- strawman
- hasty generalization
- red herring
- appeal to emotion

Option 1: ad hominem. An ad hominem fallacy attacks the person making the argument rather than addressing the argument itself. This is not about diverting the topic with irrelevant content, but rather about personal attacks, so this option does not describe the given prompt.

Option 2: strawman. A strawman fallacy occurs when someone misrepresents an opponent’s position to make it easier to attack. Here, there is no misrepresentation of an argument; the phrase lists fallacy names, not a distorted claim, so this does not fit.

Option 3: hasty generalization. This fallacy involves drawing a broad conclusion from insufficient or unrepresentative evidence. The prompt does not present an insufficient sample or rapid generalization; it labels several fallacies, so this is not the correct category.

Option 4: red herring. A red herring is a distraction tactic that diverts attention from the main issue by introducing an irrelevant topic. In the context of a question asking to identify the named fallacy, selecting red herring would indicate that this option points to a diversion from the actual logical error being described, which matches the intent when the prompt lists multiple fallacy names and asks which one is being referenced.

Option 5: appeal to emotion. This fallacy relies on triggering emotions rather than presenting logical reasons. The prompt itself is a meta-question about naming fallacies, not about an argument that leverages emotional appeal, so this option does not describe the given item.

Overall, the set of options includes several common fallacy types, and the label that best corresponds to the distractive nature of selecting among fallacies in a test-style prompt is the red herring, since it diverts attention from evaluating the argument to identifying a misdirection itself. The other options describe different specific fallacies that require a direct attack on the argument (ad hominem), a misrepresented position (strawman), a sweeping generalization from insufficient data (hasty generalization), or an emotion-driven rather than reason-driven appeal (appeal to emotion).

Question at position 23 ad hominemstrawmanhasty generalizationred herringappeal to emotion

查看解析

登录即可查看完整答案

类似问题

A politician argues: “We must implement my economic plan. If we don’t, our nation will fall into a terrible depression and millions will suffer.” This statement primarily represents:

A politician argues: “We must implement my economic plan. If we don’t, our nation will fall into a terrible depression and millions will suffer.” This statement primarily represents:

People should not wear fur coats because it’s the wrong thing to do. Football is fun to watch because it’s such an enjoyable game.

Question at position 38 red herringstrawmanad hominemhasty generalizationjumping into conclusions

Which of the following best identifies a misuse of evidence or logic in the passage?

Question at position 16 appeal to emotionstrawmanad hominemred herringhasty generalization

"In advocating expanded unemployment benefits, someone observed that 'All the European countries have higher unemployment rates than we do but also stronger support systems for the unemployed.' " This argument supporting expanded unemployment benefits can best be countered by arguing that

Son: Wow, Dad, it's really hard to make a living on my salary. Father: Consider yourself lucky, son. Why? When I was your age, I only made $40 a week. The above is a good example of _______________ fallacy.

更多留学生实用工具

考试浏览器助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单