Question at position 16 appeal to emotionstrawmanad hominemred herringhasty generalization

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The question asks to identify the type of fallacy demonstrated by the statement in the prompt. 
Option 1: 'appeal to emotion' — This is a fallacy that relies on manipulating emotions to persuade rather than using valid reasoning. If the statement provokes pity or fear to influence belief about pandas or homelessness, this could be considered an appeal to emotion, but we need to see if that is the primary mechanism in the given statement. 
Option 2: 'strawman' — This involves misrepresenting an opponent’s position to make it easier to attack. There is no present attempt to misrepresent another argument; the statement about pandas and homelessness does not rewrite someone else’s position. 
Option 3: 'ad hominem' — This fallacy targets a person rather than the argument, attacking character instead of using evidence. The given line does not attack a person, so ad hominem is not fitting here. 
Option 4: 'red herring' — A red herring diverts attention away from the real issue by introducing an irrelevant topic. The statement about pandas and homelessness might be used to distract from the actual debate about policy or ethics, which would be consistent with a red herring. 
Option 5: 'hasty generalization' — This is a conclusion drawn from insufficient or unrepresentative evidence. The sentence does not present a broad generalization based on limited data, so this seems unlikely. 
In the context provided, the prompt explicitly identifies 'red herring' as the chosen answer, which aligns with the idea that the panda question is being used to distract from the main issue rather than address it directly. 
Thus, the evaluation hinges on whether the statement about pandas functions as a diversion rather than a substantive argument, which characterizes a red herring. 
If the goal is to guide a student through the reasoning, note that other options rely on different misdirections: emotional manipulation (appeal to emotion), misrepresentation (strawman), personal attack (ad hominem), or broad conclusions from little data (hasty generalization). Each of these would require a specific pattern that is not evident in the provided sentence, supporting the classification as red herring in this example.

Question at position 16 appeal to emotionstrawmanad hominemred herringhasty generalization

查看解析

登录即可查看完整答案

类似问题

A politician argues: “We must implement my economic plan. If we don’t, our nation will fall into a terrible depression and millions will suffer.” This statement primarily represents:

A politician argues: “We must implement my economic plan. If we don’t, our nation will fall into a terrible depression and millions will suffer.” This statement primarily represents:

People should not wear fur coats because it’s the wrong thing to do. Football is fun to watch because it’s such an enjoyable game.

Question at position 38 red herringstrawmanad hominemhasty generalizationjumping into conclusions

Question at position 23 ad hominemstrawmanhasty generalizationred herringappeal to emotion

Which of the following best identifies a misuse of evidence or logic in the passage?

"In advocating expanded unemployment benefits, someone observed that 'All the European countries have higher unemployment rates than we do but also stronger support systems for the unemployed.' " This argument supporting expanded unemployment benefits can best be countered by arguing that

Son: Wow, Dad, it's really hard to make a living on my salary. Father: Consider yourself lucky, son. Why? When I was your age, I only made $40 a week. The above is a good example of _______________ fallacy.

更多留学生实用工具

考试浏览器助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单