Both the Liquidity Coverage Ratio and the Net Stable Funding Ratio assess a bank’s ability to meet its cash needs over a 30-day horizon.

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The statement presents a claim about two liquidity standards and how long they evaluate cash needs. 
Option 1: True. This would assert that both the Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR) and the Net Stable Funding Ratio (NSFR) look at cash needs over a 30-day horizon. While the LCR is indeed anchored to a 30-day horizon, the NSFR is designed to measure funding stability over a longer, one-year horizon. This makes the statement incomplete or inaccurate in its portrayal of NSFR’s time frame. 
Option 2: False. This option aligns with the established definitions: the LCR covers a 30-day horizon to ensure sufficient high-quality liquid assets to survive a 30-day stressed scenario, whereas the NSFR assesses the stability of funding over a longer period, typically one year, comparing available stable funding to required stable funding over that horizon. The discrepancy in time horizons between the two metrics is the source of the inaccuracy in the original claim. 
In examining why the first option misstates the issue, it misrepresents the NSFR by implying a uniform 30-day window for both ratios, which would neglect the regulatory intent of NSFR to promote longer-term funding stability. Conversely, recognizing the NSFR’s year-long focus helps clarify why the combined statement is not correct. 
Additionally, consider how each ratio is used in practice: the LCR is a liquidity risk metric emphasizing short-term survivability in stressed conditions, while the NSFR is a structural funding metric aimed at long-term resilience. This separation of horizons is a deliberate feature of the Basel liquidity framework. 
If you were determining the truth value from the options alone, you would weigh the mismatched horizon for NSFR against the stated 30-day horizon for both, leading to the conclusion that the claim as stated does not accurately describe both ratios.

ERMCPS5250_006_2025_1 - EXTERNAL STAKEHOLDER REQUIREMENTS Quiz 3 - Systemic Risk/Dodd-Frank Act

Both the Liquidity Coverage Ratio and the Net Stable Funding Ratio assess a bank’s ability to meet its cash needs over a 30-day horizon.

查看解析

登录即可查看完整答案

类似问题

Parsa's Organics currently has $56 in debt for every $100 in equity. If the company were to use some of its cash to purchase additional inventory, while maintaining its current equity and net income, which one of the following would decrease?

If a firm’s current ratio is increasing, it is likely that…

Financial ratios that measure the ability of a firm to meet its short-term commitments are known as ………… ratios.

Financial ratios that measure the ability of a firm to meet its short-term commitments are known as ………… ratios.

Which of the following actions would NOT affect the quick / liquid ratio of a firm?

GreenTech has a current ratio of 2.5, higher than the industry average of 1.8. What does this likely indicate about GreenTech relative to the industry average:

Even though Firm A's current ratio exceeds that of Firm B, Firm B's quick ratio might exceed that of A. However, if A's quick ratio exceeds B's, then we can be certain that A's current ratio is also larger than B's.

A firm's long term assets = $100,000, total assets = $400,000, inventory = $50,000 and current liabilities = $200,000. Compute the current ratio and the quick ratio

更多留学生实用工具

考试浏览器助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单