According to the Nunberg (1999) article, which of the following is true about the immigrants to the US and their relationship to English?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The question asks about what Nunberg (1999) reports regarding immigrants to the US and their relationship to English. Here are the options analyzed one by one:

Option 1: 'They are learning English faster than immigrants in the past did.' This statement aligns with a common finding attributed to contemporary research: newer immigrant groups often show relatively rapid adoption of English compared to earlier waves, reflecting changing social, educational, and policy environments that facilitate English acquisition. It captures a trend toward quicker English learning as integration progresses, and this is a plausible interpretation of Nunberg’s discussion on language assimilation and immigrant adaptation.

Option 2: 'Attitude surveys suggest they are generally not willing to learn English.' If this were accurate, it would imply a widespread unwillingness to learn English across immigrant groups. However, Nunberg’s analysis typically emphasizes exposure, practical incentives, and structural factors that encourage English learning, rather than a broad, uniform resistance. Moreover, attitude surveys often reveal nuanced views rather than a blanket unwillingness, making this option less consistent with the nuanced picture Nunberg presents.

Option 3: 'They are generally more concerned with preserving their first language than with learning English.' This suggests a strong, overarching emphasis on native-language maintenance at the expense of English acquisition. While language maintenance is a real consideration for some communities, Nunberg's article usually discusses English learning as a salient outcome of integration processes, and it does not claim that preservation of the first language universally dominates over learning English for all immigrants. Therefore, this option overstates a single priority across diverse groups.

Option 4: 'They are supportive of English-only policies because of the benefits it would provide them with.' This asserts a broad support for English-only policies among immigrants based on self-interested perceived benefits. Nunberg’s work on language use and policy tends to treat immigrants as navigating a complex set of incentives and constraints, and it typically does not portray a universal endorsement of English-only measures by immigrants themselves. Thus, this option misunderstands the diverse attitudes toward language policy among immigrant communities.

In summary, the first option best captures a plausible, evidence-informed trend discussed by Nunberg: that contemporary immigrants are learning English at a rate faster than in the past, reflecting changes in social context, education, and policy that facilitate language acquisition.

ling_222_120251_246103 Week 9 Reading Quiz

According to the Nunberg (1999) article, which of the following is true about the immigrants to the US and their relationship to English?

查看解析

登录即可查看完整答案

类似问题

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

Economic stress and unpredictable times have resulted in a booming industry for self-help products

People born without creativity never can develop it

A product has a selling price of $20, a contribution margin ratio of 40% and fixed cost of $120,000. To make a profit of $30,000. The number of units that must be sold is: Type the number without $ and a comma. Eg: 20000

Which of the following statement regarding cost is correct:

Under the assumptions used in cost-volume-profit analysis, as the activity increases:

The CVP and break-even analysis are supported by a range of important assumptions. Which of the following is not an assumption of the CVP:

The break-even point is that at which:

更多留学生实用工具

考试浏览器助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单