Which of the following is NOT a reason why the land around Auckland is so valuable for agriculture?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The provided data for this question is incomplete: the list of answer options is missing, so we cannot analyze each alternative as requested. What we do have is the stated correct option from the 'answer' field: 'c. No competing uses of land.'

However, the assertion in option c is typically incorrect as a general statement about land value for agriculture. In most agricultural regions, land around a major city like Auckland is valuable precisely because there are competing uses and pressures on land: urban growth, housing development, infrastructure, conservation, and other agricultural or commercial activities compete for the same parcels of land. This competition tends to drive up land values and shapes land-use patterns, often making agricultural land particularly valuable when it sits in a desirable location with good access to markets, ports, and services.

To understand why 'no competing uses of land' is not a valid reason, consider these points:
- In most areas near cities, land faces multiple demand channels (housing, industry, transport corridors, recreation, and farming), which makes the claim of a lack of competing uses highly unlikely.
- The opportunity cost of keeping land for agriculture is often high when there is potential for urban or industrial development nearby, which itself can make agricultural land valuable but for different reasons (proximity to markets, infrastructure, and climate suitability).
- Land value tends to reflect not just suitability for agriculture but also access to inputs (water, fertilizers, labor) and outputs (markets, processing facilities, exports via ports). Competing uses can increase overall land value by enhancing accessibility and economic integration, even if they constrain some agricultural uses.

Since no alternative options are present to compare against, we cannot evaluate how each other choice would be incorrect. In a complete set of options, we would assess each statement for accuracy by linking it to agricultural land values driven by climate, soil quality, water availability, topography, market access, and regulatory/policy context, and determine which one does not fit the common explanations for land value around Auckland.

Which of the following is NOT a reason why the land around Auckland is so valuable for agriculture?

查看解析

登录即可查看完整答案

类似问题

Which of the following are uses for lawns in the USA?

Use your knowledge of land use and agricultural inputs to match the letters on the graph with the food product that they represent. 1: A 2: B 3: C 4: D

Agricultural cropland production (pasture lands excluded) is practiced on approximately what percentage of the global land surface?

Which of the following is NOT a reason why the land around Auckland is so valuable for agriculture?

Briefly describe the landscape in this spot. Type: 36 33 24.65N, 140 32 10.97E

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

更多留学生实用工具

考试浏览器助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单