Unions try to ensure that unionized employees receive similar wages and benefits across unionized organizations. What is the effect of this strategy?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The question asks about the effect of unions trying to ensure similar wages and benefits across unionized organizations.
First, note that the provided answer option is: 'Higher wages are removed as a source of competitive disadvantage.'
This statement suggests that by standardizing wages and benefits across unionized firms, wage levels stop being a differentiating (and potentially disadvantageous) factor in competition.
To analyze, consider what collective bargaining across unions aims to do: reduce wage dispersion, stabilize compensation costs, and prevent individual firms from underpaying or overpaying employees relative to peers in the industry.
- If wages and benefits become more uniform, firms lose the advantage they might gain (or the disadvantage they might suffer) from deviating in pay to attract or retain workers. In other words, wage competition among unionized firms is dampened, so higher-wage differentials are less likely to translate into a competitive disadvantage.
- This does not mean there is no impact on competitiveness overall; it mainly affects wage-based competition, not other cost factors or productivity differences. Firms may still compete on efficiency, benefits, location, or product quality, but the legacy of wage-based head-to-head competition is reduced.
- From a logical standpoint, the statement is consistent with the idea that when similar wages and benefits are negotiated industry-wide or within unions, wage costs become more predictable and less of a free-for-all, which mitigates the risk that paying above-market wages would erode competitiveness.
Now, addressing potential limitations or misconceptions:
- One caveat is that standardization can raise overall wage costs if the standardized level is higher than what some firms could sustain, potentially shifting where competitiveness pressures appear (e.g., on productivity or other cost components).
- Another nuance is that standardization among unionized firms does not automatically translate to all industries or to nonunionized competitors, so overall market competitiveness may still vary widely.
- The statement also presumes that the primary competitive lever is wage level. In reality, benefits, work rules, and productivity-linked pay can also alter competitiveness even when wages are aligned.
In summary, the claim that higher wages are removed as a source of competitive disadvantage aligns with the effect of reducing wage-based price competition among unionized employers by standardizing compensation. It captures the central idea that uniform wages lessen wage-driven competitiveness differentials, even though other factors may still influence overall competitive position.

MGHA12H3 S LEC01 Class 10 Quiz

Unions try to ensure that unionized employees receive similar wages and benefits across unionized organizations. What is the effect of this strategy?

查看解析

登录即可查看完整答案

类似问题

Which statement best describes unionization rates in Canada over the past few decades?

Which of the following industries is the least likely to employ a unionized labor force?

Which of the following is most likely to have a large union membership that experiences little import competition?

If unions help workers secure pension benefits, so that those workers are less dependent on government social assistance after their retirement, then

The overall union density in Canada has gradually declined to about ____ percent in 2021.

On average, union members receive ___________ wages and benefits than non-union workers.

What are some possible negative economic consequences of unions in competitive markets? (Select all that apply)

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

更多留学生实用工具

考试浏览器助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单