A common criticism of labeling theory is that labeling theorists:

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Question restatement: A common criticism of labeling theory is that labeling theorists:

Option 1: 'argue incorrectly that people are constantly being labeled' — This claim misrepresents labeling theory’s focus. Labeling theory centers on how being labeled as deviant can affect a person’s self-identity and future behavior, rather than asserting that labeling itself happens without variation. The idea that theorists “constantly” label people overstates the process and ignores context, frequency, and variation in labeling across situations.

Option 2: 'do not account for social differences' — This critique highlights a potential shortcoming: some formulations of labeling theory have been accused of downplaying how factors like class, race, gender, and power shape who gets labeled and how. While some perspectives do address differences, the general charge is that not all versions sufficiently integrate these social differences, making this a plausible objection in certain debates.

Option 3: 'insist on explaining all of deviance as labeling' — This is an exaggerated caricature. Labeling theory does not claim that every aspect of deviance is reducible to labeling; rather, it emphasizes the role of social reaction and labeling processes in perpetuating or elaborating deviance. The statement overstates the theory’s scope and misstates its central claim, making it inaccurate.

Option 4: 'neglect the processes that lead to acts being defined as deviant' — This option points to a common critique: labeling theory often focuses on the consequences after a label is applied (stigma, self-fulfilling prophecy, labeling effects) and may underemphasize the sociocultural and institutional processes that determine what counts as deviant and how those definitions are made in the first place. This is a standard substantive objection that has been raised in sociological discussions of labeling theory.

In sum, each option presents a distinct potential critique. The most widely cited challenge tends to center on how labeling theory addresses (or sometimes underemphasizes) the upstream processes that produce deviance labels in the first place, which aligns with option 4. The other options contain overstatements or mischaracterizations: option 3 falsely implies a universal insistence on labeling all deviance, option 1 overstates the labeling frequency, and option 2 raises a valid concern about social differences but is not as direct a description of the classic criticism as option 4. The phrasing and emphasis of each critique vary, illustrating common misinterpretations and debates surrounding labeling theory.

SMC 2025 Smr - SOCIOL 1 (1561,1562) - Introduction to Sociology (O) MIDTERM EXAM

A common criticism of labeling theory is that labeling theorists:

查看解析

登录即可查看完整答案

类似问题

According to Chambliss’s study on deviance, how did society’s reaction to the Roughnecks influence their behavior?

According to Chambliss’s study on deviance, what was the main difference between the Saints and the Roughnecks?

Labels such as "gifted," "average," and "deficient" that are placed on students by schools __________.

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

Economic stress and unpredictable times have resulted in a booming industry for self-help products

更多留学生实用工具

考试浏览器助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单