Why was Marbury v. Madison an important U.S. Supreme Court case?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Question restatement: Why was Marbury v. Madison an important U.S. Supreme Court case? Answer options:
1) The court ruled that U.S. state laws establishing racial segregation in public schools are unconstitutional.
2) The court held that redistricting qualifies as a justiciable question under the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause, thus enabling federal courts to hear Fourteenth Amendment-based redistricting cases.
3) The court decided that the U.S. Constitution requires U.S. states to provide attorneys to criminal defendants who are unable to afford their own.
4) The case allowed the court to determine the constitutionality of the laws.

Option 1 analysis: This statement describes the outcome of Brown v. Board of Education (1954), not Marbury v. Madison. It confuses case topics—federal judicial review vs. state segregation in schools—so it is incorrect based on content and timeline.

Option 2 analysis: This describes issues related to redistricting and equal protection, which involve later constitutional questions and different doctrinal developments (e.g., Reynolds v. Sims or other civil rights-era cases). It does not capture the core holding of Marbury v. Madison, so it is not correct in relation to this case.

Option 3 analysis: This concerns the right to counsel for indigent defendants, a landmark issue arising from later cases such as Gideon v. Wainwright (1963). It is not relevant to Marbury v. Madison’s key contribution, so this is inaccurate in this context.

Option 4 analysis: This statement reflects the central, foundational outcome of Marbury v. Madison: it established judicial review—the power of the courts to interpret the Constitution and determine the constitutionality of laws and executive actions. This is the pivotal reason the decision is esteemed, as it created a check on legislative and executive branches and established the court’s role in constitutional interpretation. The reasoning behind this choice hinges on the precedential idea that the judiciary can strike down laws or governmental actions that violate the Constitution, thereby shaping the balance of governmental powers.

In summary, the incorrect options either describe outcomes from other historical cases or misstate the focus of Marbury v. Madison, whereas the correct framing highlights the establishment of judicial review as the court’s authority to evaluate constitutionality of laws.

Why was Marbury v. Madison an important U.S. Supreme Court case?

查看解析

登录即可查看完整答案

类似问题

The main duty of the Supreme Court is judicial

Question at position 8 What is the chief responsibility of the U.S. Supreme Court? Acts as the ultimate authority in interpreting the U.S. ConstitutionEnsures legislation passed by Congress is adoptedResponsible for collecting federal taxesSelects federal judges

Which body has the power to interpret laws?

The main duty of the Supreme Court is judicial

Question at position 8 What is the chief responsibility of the U.S. Supreme Court? Acts as the ultimate authority in interpreting the U.S. ConstitutionEnsures legislation passed by Congress is adoptedResponsible for collecting federal taxesSelects federal judges

Which body has the power to interpret laws?

Is the Wednesbury test a subjective or objective test?

更多留学生实用工具

考试浏览器助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单