Which component of Hatfield and Walster’s (1981) three-factor theory of love is most relevant to the principle of proximity in attraction?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Question restatement: Which component of Hatfield and Walster’s (1981) three-factor theory of love is most relevant to the principle of proximity in attraction?

Option 1: Emotional arousal. This choice highlights the physiological or emotional arousal aspect, which Hatfield and Walster describe as one of the three factors influencing love. However, proximity does not directly refer to the arousal itself; proximity mainly affects the likelihood of encountering the partner and thus the opportunity for arousal to occur, so this option is focusing on the wrong linkage.

Option 2: An appropriate love object present. This option captures the idea that proximity increases the chance that a person comes into contact with a compatible or suitable partner—the so-called appropriate love object. In social psychology, proximity operates by increasing exposure to a potential love object, which aligns with this facet of the theory where the presence of a target object is essential for love to develop. This is the best match to the principle of proximity.

Option 3: A cultural determinant that acknowledges love as a state. While culture can shape attitudes toward love, Hatfield and Walster’s three-factor theory centers on arousal, labeling, and the presence of an object rather than a cultural determinant as a core component. Proximity is not about cultural determinants per se, so this option mislabels the connection.

Option 4: Self-labelling of arousal as “love.” This describes a cognitive labeling process, akin to misattribution of arousal, but Hatfield and Walster’s model identifies labeling as one of the mechanisms that can shape the experience of love, not the proximal condition that proximity directly supplies. The proximity principle is about having an appropriate object nearby, not how arousal is interpreted after it occurs.

In sum, proximity functions by increasing the likelihood that an appropriate love object is available, making option 2 the most accurate alignment with the proximity principle in the theory. The other options focus on arousal, cultural ideas, or labeling processes, which do not directly explain how proximity facilitates the formation of love within Hatfield and Walster’s framework.

Which component of Hatfield and Walster’s (1981) three-factor theory of love is most relevant to the principle of proximity in attraction?

查看解析

登录即可查看完整答案

类似问题

Which of the following is NOT a key influence on liking and attraction?

Chad wants his new coworker Jamal to like him. All of the following could increase the likelihood of attraction EXCEPT:

You are looking at matches on a dating app. Based on just the information below, who are you LEAST likely to be attracted to?

Rosalinda, who is attractive, intelligent, and high in social status, marries Jorge. He is also attractive, intelligent, and has a high social status. Their relationship is best understood as an example of

A talkative, extroverted young woman is strongly attracted to a quiet, introverted, middle-aged man. Her attraction to the man would be predicted by

Natalie likes her classmate, Wyatt, who always helps her with her assignments and projects. She likes him more than anyone in her class as she can rely on him on any given day to get her work done. Which of the following theories explains Natalie's liking in this scenario?

Which of the following is NOT a key influence on liking and attraction?

Madison and Andrew can't stand each other. They have gone to school together since kindergarten, but they get on each other's nerves. To everyone's surprise in their senior year, they became girlfriend and boyfriend. What factor of romantic attraction relates to how Madison and Andrew got together?

更多留学生实用工具

考试浏览器助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单